ERIC'S BIT or LITERARY COMPANIONS OF THE SCOURGE OF RIVER CITY
When Mary said she was going to write about mirrors the first thing I thought of was The Hungry Glass, an episode of the television series Thriller, which scared my very young and sensitive self out of my overly active wits. A married couple moves into a house that is haunted by images reflected in glass and mirrors. Eventually the hazy phantom in an attic mirror reaches right through the glass to grab the inquisitive wife and draw her into the mirror. Well, I don't mind telling you, that just about did me in.
Okay, I was eleven. The Hungry Glass was not exactly Orphee, though it was written by Robert Bloch who was pretty darned good, and Donna Douglas and William Shatner were not quite Maria Casares and Jean Marais. Yes, the protagonist in the drama that scared me silly went on to play the only wooden Star Fleet captain in Federation history and the terrifying ghost in the mirror turned out to be Elly May Clampett of the Beverly Hillbillies. Makes you wonder, doesn't it?
Mirrors are disturbing. I never understood those diagrams showing how light enters a mirror and is reversed. They made it look like the light passes right through the mirror, only adding to the mystery. Thanks to mirrors I'm not even sure what I look like, since the image I see in the bathroom mirror is the reverse of what the world sees. Is that a good thing or bad? Do most people see themselves as looking like they do in photographs or in the mirror? I never look at photos of myself, if I can help it.
A few days ago I read Low Heights, a 2003 mystery by the French author Pascal Garnier. A character botches his impersonation of another man when he forgets about the perversity of mirrors and puts a distinguishing scar on the wrong side of his face. He'd had a stroke and maybe his mind was deteriorating. It is a strange book. The poor fellow retires to the mountains with his nurse. One day a man arrives claiming to be his long-lost son. Then the vultures show up. Literal as well as figurative.
"In the tradition of Simenon" the blurb said. As do the blurbs on most French mysteries in translation. Georges Simenon is far better known outside France than any other French mystery writer. He is one of my favorite authors, French or otherwise, not just for his mysteries but for the non-Maigret books he dubbed "hard novels" as well.
There are an immense number of Simenon books available in English, but not so many by other French mystery novelists. As far as I know publishers have not stampeded to translate them as they have Scandinavian works. A shame, because I developed a liking for French literature back in college when one of my courses introduced me to everything from Voltaire and Balzac (the scourge of River City, you might recall) up to Louis Ferdinand Celine and Alain Robbe-Grillet.
During the last couple of weeks I thought to read some French mystery authors. I mentioned Pascal Garnier. I also read Three to Kill, one of ten mysteries written by Jean-Patrick Manchette in the seventies and early eighties. He is said to have reinvigorated the French mystery. In Three to Kill businessman Georges Gerfaut witnesses a murder. He's a typical man on the run until he decides to turn the tables and track down his pursuers. The plot does not develop as formulaically as you might expect. Manchette's style and ironic perspective make for a different kind of reading experience than you would get from the usual English language bestseller.
Perhaps it is only the result of cultural differences but French writers have always struck me as rather eccentric in the way they write, the characters they write about, and the stories they tell. There is a certain (don't hate me for saying it) je ne sais quoi about their novels. For example, consider Fred Vargas (the archaeologist Frédérique Audoin-Rouzeau) whose series sleuth Commissaire Jean-Baptiste Adamsberg doesn't use deductive reasoning. Whereas Simenon's Inspector Maigret solves crimes by discovering the true natures and motivations of those involved at which point the murderer becomes clear, Adamsberg doesn't even do that. He purports to be able to sense the evil and cruelty oozing out of perpetrators. In The Chalk Circle Man this peculiar detective -- who still carries a flame for a vanished
mistress who had a pet monkey named Richard III -- seeks a man who is drawing blue chalk circles at night around stray objects in Paris streets, sensing that a circle will soon surround a corpse.
Whether these French mysteries are representative or not I can't say. Next up on my list is a mystery by Patrick Modiano which ought to be good since he won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2013. At any rate it is sure to be different from what I'm used to and maybe that's why I enjoy French authors. They offer me a slightly disorienting view of the world, like looking at the reversed image in a mirror.
AND FINALLY
Just to add to the cold collywobbles experienced by most of us when contemplating April 15th aka US Tax Return Day, a quick reminder the same date will also see the arrival of the next issue of Orphan Scrivener.
See you then!
Mary R & Eric
who invite you to visit their home page, to be found hanging out on the virtual washing line that is the Web at http://reedmayermysteries.000webhostapp.com/ There you'll discover the usual suspects, including more personal essays, a bibliography, and our growing libraries of links to free e-texts of classic and Golden Age mysteries, ghost stories, and tales of the supernatural. It also hosts the Orphan Scrivener archive, so don't say you weren't warned! Our joint blog, largely devoted to reviews of Golden Age of Mystery fiction, lurks about at http://ericreedmysteries.blogspot.com/ Intrepid subscribers may also wish to know our noms des Twitter are @marymaywrite and @groggytales. Drop in some time!
No comments:
Post a Comment