Monday, December 15, 2003

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER ISSUE # TWENTY-FOUR l5 DECEMBER 2003

This month's Orphan Scrivener is being composed as snow falls thick and fast and weather forecasters are making noises about yet another nor’easter to follow in a day or two. Thus doubtless a number of subscribers will soon, if they haven't already, sympathise with the lot of the Pilgrim Fathers who, as U. S. Grant observed, came to a country sporting nine months of winter and cold weather the rest of the time.

One of Willa Cather’s characters opines winter hangs on so long in country towns that it becomes sullen, stale, and shabby, whereas on farms the usual workday round progresses beneath the weather, as streams meander along under ice. The equally chilly beginning of The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe reveals in Narnia at that time it was always snowing and never Christmas, whereas snow or no our present round of holidays are not too far away now.

Psychologists declare these festive jamborees are often a time of great stress, so in the spirit of the season, we trust you'll forgive us by adding to yours by cybering you this latest newsletter.

On the other hand, at least it's not sullen, stale, or shabby...we hope!


ERIC'S BIT or MARK HIS WORDS

Mark Twain wrote an essay that I haven't been able to locate, except for the fragmentary copy in my memory, in which he fulminated about the state of the world and called a spade a spade and worse -- a rant in today's jargon -- and ended with the explanation to the effect: I can dare to say all these things because I am a dead man.

He was right, of course. Or rather, he wasn't right when he wrote the words, but is, now, so many years after his death.

We tend to take words for granted. We use them constantly. They're common and disposable. They help us remember we need garbage bags and cat treats at the grocery store, yet they also preserve the thoughts of those whose bodies are dust, allow us to see through dead eyes, observe worlds that no longer exist.

It's been said that words have a life of their own, but that isn't true. By themselves they are only ink on paper or stored electrical patterns. They can only live in the minds of an audience. The audience is what matters the most. A writer is almost never present when his or her words are read. Some writers are as dead as Mark Twin, but once the words are out in the world, the audience doesn't need the person who wrote them.

It's the writer who needs the audience.

Last issue I mentioned starting a blog. Why, I'm not sure. Just because...or perhaps as it's the "in" thing, as we used to say. So I blogged a bit and stopped, and then blogged some more, and stopped again. It didn't feel right. Something was missing.

The audience.

Mind you, I'm not talking about an audience that applauds or communicates its existence in any manner. Rather what was missing was my own idea of a potential audience. When Mark Twain wrote that essay, which I hope isn't a figment of my imagination, obviously he couldn't have expected feedback from people who would be alive when he was dead. However, he surely wrote with those readers in mind, and this helped him shape the words.

There are those who purport to write for themselves, but I am not particularly interested in communicating with myself. Manipulating words effectively enough to reach others is the challenge, and it helps to know who these others are.

Some bloggers write about specific subjects and have an implicit audience. Others connect to a number of fellow bloggers, forming their audience that way. Perhaps some writers, blogging without specific readers in mind, feel they are addressing the entire population of the world wide web. To me, it just feels like talking to empty cyberspace.

I prefer to aim my writing toward someone. Mystery readers, for instance.

Many libraries are now online. Occasionally we browse and can see that someone in Texas or Alaska has checked out one of the novels and might be reading it at that moment. When I write, I'm motivated by this audience of people about whom I know nothing -- except that they read mysteries.

I'm fortunate there are people willing to read the books Mary and I write, who make it worthwhile to do something I enjoy doing.

Having said that, I'll bet irascible old Mark Twain would've been one heck of a blogger!


NECESSARY EVIL or THE BSP TICKER

We have a fair bit of news this time around, so here ‘tis!

NOT YOUR KIPLING'S IF or FUN AND GAMES WITH ERIC

A month or so back KFAdrift, editor of the InsideAdrift Newsletter, interviewed Eric. The resulting chat -- in which Eric discusses writing interactive fiction computer games (IF) -- can be perused by visiting the InsideAdrift site http://www.insideadrift.org.uk/ and checking the archive for the November issue, or by going directly to the pdf file at http://www.kfadrift.org.uk/insideadrift//files/insideadrift1 1.pdf

Reading the newsletter will also provide pointers toward some good games written by folk who can *really* program! Interactive fiction is generally text only. The reader plays the part of the protagonist and participates by typing in simple commands, so don't worry, there are none of those thumb-wiggling shoot 'em ups.

GIFT FOR SUBSCRIBERS or YULE BE DRIVEN CRACKERS

Speaking of games, as an early surprise Christmas box for subscribers, we've uploaded an unpublished story in the form of an interactive game to our website (URL below). The Thorn can be played online or readers can download a version. Admittedly, it might turn out to be like one of those elaborate toys that look so cool way up on the store shelf, but when you unwrap it on Christmas morning turns out to be just lousy cardboard and the wheels fall off. Which is to say, this is an experiment which may run on some machines and just sit there on others, but the only way to find out is to try it and see.

TRUE LIES or RESEARCH REVELATIONS

We were honoured to hear a week or so back that librarian Barbara Fister (author of the mystery novel On Edge) quoted a couple of comments we'd made on the topic of research as part of her lecture on True Lies, Libraries, Research, and the Facts of Fiction. Addressed to the November 2003 retreat for members of the Cooperating Libraries in Consortium, her presentation also included observations on the subject from such luminaries as Loren Estleman and George Pelecanos. Interested parties can peruse the text of her lecture at http://www.barbarafister.com/TrueLies.html Our thanks to Barbara for this unexpected reference!

EH, CANADA? or A MYSTERIOUS ACCOLADE

A subscriber in Canada tells us that their local library is featuring Four For A Boy on its Picks of the Year shelf. Needless to say, we're thrilled. The accolade is much appreciated, even though the library's location is as yet unknown.

MEA CULPA or A SECOND HELPING OF HUMBLE PIE

When we mentioned A Second Helping of Murder last time we omitted to note its publisher is Poisoned Pen Press, the very folk who bring you John's adventures. Sorry about that, PPP! However, since we're revisiting the collection, we'll mention one or two other recipes therein while we're at it. For a start, there's a high energy cocktail from Elaine Viets rejoicing in the name of Absolut Bawls, Donna Andrews provides instructions for her grandmother's chocolate cookies, and Taffy Cannon shows how to make Rueben Dip. Meanwhile, Rhys Bowen appears with Madame Yvette's quiche- like leek tart and Mary's fellow Geordie Meg Chittenden reveals the Agony Of The Leaves -- and to put readers out of theirs, it's nothing to do with reading tea leaves!

(DE)SIGN OF THE TIMES or I-IN(G) THE FUTURE

Eric's spruced up the website, making it a bit simpler and, we hope, more attractive and friendlier to the wide variety of browsers out there. The front page now features the cover of Five For Silver, which will be published at the beginning of March. However, the paperback of Four For a Boy won't be appearing until June, because it will be a mass market paperback from ibooks, a Simon & Schuster imprint!

MARY'S BIT or SAVAGING PULP FICTION

For a bit of light relief these dark nights, I've been reading some of the pulp fiction available at the Black Mask Online website. Currently I'm cutting a swathe through a tumultuous multitude of Doc Savage short stories. (If this type of work is not of interest, subscribers might like to look around Black Mask's mystery selection at http://www.blackmask.com/page.php?do=page&cat_id=38)

The Doc Savage fictionettes are classic examples of Good vs Evil adventures, usually with a dash of mystery, unfolding at a fast pace and often taking place in foreign settings. It's true these stories are not always politically correct, but that's hardly surprisingly bearing in mind the era in which they were scrivened. However, as with the Fu Manchu tales (a couple of which are available on the Black Mask site) they're excellent examples of the rattling good yarn wherein our hero leaps from one improbable situation to the next, pausing only to either deploy all manner of amazing inventions to thwart his pursuers or else engage in fisticuffs with assorted villains who are generally of unusual build, character and ambition, the latter inclination often being in the nature of world domination and/or making a fortune by illegal means. Good inevitably triumphs, even if Evil or its minions generally contrive to escape to stir up more trouble in the next entry in the series, which in Doc Savage's case is just as likely to take place under the waters of the Hudson River (hint: small submarines are involved) as in Switzerland or Portugal (reached, of course, by fast transatlantic Clipper).

Occasional references provide modern readers a smile or two. My favourites thus far include a telephone answering machine that records messages on a wire, the luxury flat at a highly prestigious address in central New York costing a whopping ten or twelve thousand dollars a year to rent, Doc's roadster, capable of zooming along at over 70 miles an hour (and furthermore fitted with short wave radio), his two- engined amphibian plane (used in one story to investigate dubious goings-on deep in the Amazon jungle, though he had to stop to refuel on the way), and last but not least large cellophane sacks fitted with elasticated hems serving to keep these bags snug against necks when used as gas masks.

Two observations about this series, if I may. First, it seems Doc's father, for reasons I've still to ascertain, arranged to have the boy raised by scientists from the time he was a baby to the day he left for college. Their aim was to make Doc a physical and mental uber-specimen, not to mention a scientific genius, and in this they certainly succeeded. Yet despite his less than usual upbringing Doc is a fairly normal adult although shy around women, whom apparently he doesn't understand. Readers these days could be forgiven for expecting such a psychologically damaging upbringing to produce a twisted, bitter, and vengeful monster, but in Doc's case the result was a modern day knight in shining armour, or rather a forerunner of the modern bullet-proof vest which he and his cohorts wear during dangerous investigations.

Secondly, and of particular interest to mystery authors, perusal of this fiction has provided an inventive excuse to trot out the next time an editor insists a book must specify details of whatever exotic poison did in Lady Whatsname- Chumleigh in the manor house library or disposed of the moustachio-twirling blackmailer awaiting his pay-off in the porch of the village church. In Birds of Death, the publisher inserted a note -- in mid-narrative, no less -- informing readers that the chemical formulae for gases and other such mixtures mentioned in the text were never precisely specified not so much because they could not be made, but rather on the grounds that such knowledge would be dangerous in criminal hands.

Since, however, readers are assured these concoctions are not impossible to replicate, perhaps such criminal elements as perused these inventive stories were diverted from engaging in plotting or executing wrong-doing for a while by spending days trying to recreate the marvellous mixes manufactured in Doc's personal laboratory.


AND FINALLY

One of the things Mary notices about this country is that in many places the sound of church bells is sadly lacking. Few UK residents live out of earshot of such tintinnabulation, and so the peals calling the faithful to worship form part of Sunday morning's soundtrack, along with the sizzle of bacon and eggs and the rustling of the pages of the News of the World or the Sunday Times, depending on individual household demographics.

Tolling the passing bell at funerals (mentioned in Dorothy L. Sayers' Nine Tailors) and the clamour of bell ringing practice, which for some reason seems to be held mostly on Thursday nights, are other occasions when the bells are heard bawling brazenly. The happy custom of ringing a peal as a newly wedded couple emerges from the church is so much part of British tradition that its lack during the war years, when church bells would only be rung to mark invasion or victory, must have been particularly missed.

Indeed, the TV transmission of the wedding of Charles and Diana must have brought many a nostalgic lump to British throats when one section of the broadcast closed with a lingering, increasingly long-range, aerial view of the church steeple in the village near the Spencer family estate, the joyous ringing of bells fading way under and into a lush instrumental version of Greensleeves.

There will, however, soon be another event when church bells will be heard across Britain since in about a fortnight peals will be rung to usher in the new year. Will 2004 be a good twelve months for us all? Time will tell. Speaking of criminal elements as we just did, however, one thing we can predict is that the next issue of Orphan Scrivener will arrive in your email in-box on l5 February. So we'll be back then with, as the British say, bells on.

Best wishes for the holiday season,

Mary and Eric

who invite you to visit their home page, hanging out on the virtual washing line that is the aether at

http://home.epix.net/~maywrite/ Therein you'll find the usual suspects, including more personal essays and another interactive game as well as an on-line jigsaw puzzle (at least if you have a java- enabled browser) featuring One For Sorrow's boldly scarlet cover. For those new to the subscription list there's also the Orphan Scrivener archive, so don't say you weren't warned!


Wednesday, October 15, 2003

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER ISSUE # TWENTY-THREE l5 OCTOBER 2003

Fall colour is at peak as we write, with the landscape draped in irregular drifts of yellow, ochre, gold, and lemon, occasionally rudely interrupted by a splotch or two of ruby foliage. Skeins of geese have been passing overhead after dark this week, disturbing slumbers with their eerie yelping calls, while the nightly insect chorus concert is gradually fading away. There are still bursts of bands of crickets creaking away as if they'd all just spilled out from the local pub as time was called and were standing at the door of the saloon bar discussing what to go next, but the demented sewing machine treadling sounds that form the cicada serenade are almost gone now. We've had our first frost on the pumpkins and cider, apples, gourds, and bunches of chrysanthemums are on sale again in farmers' markets, so, yes, the oracles are agreed: autumn is officially here.

Unfortunately for our readers, autumn's arrival also means the latest edition of Orphan Scrivener is about to fall on you.


MARY'S BIT or STOMP A REED'S HERO

After a manuscript has cybered off to the press and before editorial comments arrive, we have a giddy space in which to unwind, a stretch of time when we can let down our hair and be silly.

A favourite silly pastime is playing with anagrams, and needless to say the Web offers a fair number of sites wherein visitors may enter "well known words or phrases" -- as the announcer used to solemnly intone when introducing Twenty Questions in the days of steam radio -- and receive them back rearranged into anagrams. Given the circumstances, you will not be surprised to hear I but lately visited one such page at http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/index.html

With occasional re-arrangement of word order as necessary, I uncovered a few apt phrases in the yard-and-a-half long word-lists generated by words related to John's saga.

Take for example Emperor Justinian. His name and title metamphosed into JOINT RUNS A EMPIRE. Ungrammatical it may be, yet a number of historians agree that Theodora co-ruled in all but name. And speaking of John's least favourite person, the second part of the header for this burst of linguistic exuberance is a most fitting anagram for Empress Theodora. So is HADES POEM ROSTER, a suggestive phrase that immediately brings to mind Crinagoras, a whiny court poet who makes his first appearance in Fivefer.

Since we're on the subject I shall devote a few lines to Five For Silver. Set during the Justinianic plague of 542, John's investigation begins when his elderly servant Peter announces he's had a visit from an angel with a message concerning Gregory, an old army friend. It transpires Gregory has indeed been murdered, but then John discovers that Gregory was not what Peter thought he was...

In the course of his investigation John interviews people ranging from churchmen to lawyers to bear trainers and booksellers. There's also a holy fool who outrages Constantinople by such dreadful antics as dancing with the dead -- and there are many such, since thousands are dying daily in the city -- not to mention invading the imperial baths while Theodora is splashing about.

Other characters we introduce include Aristotle, dealer in dubious antiquities, and Sylvanus, keeper of oracles for a wealthy importer. However, sad to say, none of the latter's charges happened to be among those wonderful examples made by Greek smiths, whose oracular creations (according to William Butler Yeats' Sailing To Byzantium at least) sat on golden boughs and sang of events present, past, or future. Otherwise John's task would have been a lot easier!


NECESSARY EVIL or BSP TICKER

We don't find BSP an easy task either, but gritting our teeth, here we go....

NEWS OF JOHN or FIVEFER FLAPS FORTH IN FEBRUARY

We'll now do a spot of oracular singing ourselves concerning a future event, although in this case it concerns silver rather than gold (that particular precious metal is what Six is for, and to heck with the grammar police...) Thus we will now duet (readers may wish to provide their own musical accompaniment upon paper and comb) in order to tell you:

The news you'll now hear
Is that in February next year
Fivefer will appear

Crinagoras would be proud of us!

CURRYING FAVOR or IS THERE MAYHEM STILL FOR TEA?

Speaking of publication dates, this month brings A Second Helping of Murder: More Diabolically Delicious Recipes from Contemporary Mystery Writers, edited by Robert Weibezahl and Jo Grossman. Over a hundred authors are represented and since we couldn't come up with culinary instructions for Saki's mysterious Byzantine Omelette (http://www.classicreader.com/read.php/sid.6/bookid.1666/) we instead provided the very simple how to's for a dish we dubbed Justinian's Minimalist Egg Curry. Don't fancy that? No matter! Since contributors include Susan McBride, Denise Swanson, Alexander McCall Smith, George Pelecanos, Elizabeth Peters, and Robert Barnard, not to mention Agatha Christie, Raymond Chandler and (surprisingly) Edgar Allan Poe, there is doubtless something for all tastes.

EAVESDROPPING ON AUTHORS or THE PPP BLOG

A few weeks ago Rob Rosenwald set up a blog for Poisoned Pen Press authors. Writers will be posting news about what they're working on, events they'll be attending, works in print, arranging for joint appearances, sharing ideas about writing and marketing, and so on, plus Rob and Barbara will post news about PPP doings and editorial advice. You can look in at http://pppauthors.blogspot.com

This instant posting method of web activity struck Eric as so interesting that he decided to start a blog of his own, devoted to material that wouldn't quite fit into the PPP blog. There will be thoughts about writing, of course, but also other short, random musings, and interesting links he happens across. It's a bit of an experiment which may or may not continue, but for now readers can check it out at http://groggyblog.blogspot.com

AUTHOR FREEBIES or OFFERS YOU CAN HARDLY REFUSE

Well, you can certainly refuse if you feel like it, but in any event for those who're interested, we recently began assembling a list of authors' freebies. Info thus far gathered is posted at http://home.epix.net/~maywrite/freebies. This is an ongoing project so -- as with the (mostly free) mystery-related newsletter listing we've got hanging out at http://home.epix.net/~mawyrite/newslet.htm -- we'll be adding to it from time to time as information arrives. So please feel free to pop in now and then and see what's new.

JOHN IN ROME or FINGERING THE MURDERER

Mike Ashley's latest anthology, The Mammoth Book of Roman Whodunnits: Mystery and Murder in Ancient Rome, has just been published in the US by Carrol & Graf. The Finger of Aphrodite relates how John solves a murder committed in a locked room at a hostelry situated in Rome while the city is under siege by the Goths, a bunch last seen (or at least some of them) in Four For A Boy. Other tales include those penned by John Maddox Roberts, Marilyn Todd, Steven Saylor, Peter Tremayne, Rosemary Rowe, Gillian Bradshaw, and a fair number of the usual suspects -- plus one or two unexpected ones.


ERIC'S BIT or WE ALL HAVE THE RAW MATERIAL

A couple weeks ago Mary and I received our favorite email from Barbara Peters, our editor at Poisoned Pen Press. It said, in effect, the revisions we sent were suitable, we're done. and Five for Silver is ready to go! Barbara always spots ways to improve books far out of proportion to the actual word count of any changes and additions. So the process that begins to feel like an interminable grind toward the end, to me at least, is over this time around. There's nothing between us and a shiny new book next February but one last hurdle: checking the ARC.

During the years Mary and I have been working together, I've learned that writing professionally, for an audience, is hard. In order words, it is just like anything else one might do professionally. This wouldn't be much of a revelation, except that so many people appear to be convinced that the best writing is easy to do, being simply the result of sheer inspiration or perhaps the innate superiority of the author's sensibilities. I've never subscribed to the "author as a special person" school of thought. Writers don't feel more deeply than anyone else. They don't have any particularly unique view of the world. Every person has a unique view, after all. How could it be otherwise?

Perhaps this is one reason I am leery of book signings and such. I am not an interesting person. Whatever I have to offer is contained in the books and short stories on which Mary and I have collaborated. I'm not that fabulous beast known as "the author," but merely someone who writes and hopes to continue to improve at the job.

Writing can feel like magic at times, such as when we toss around plot ideas and twists and turns start to appear as if from nowhere, or when characters we have cobbled together suddenly come to life and surprise us by their words or actions. However, we aren't performing authorial legerdemain. We are just allowing our thoughts free rein, something most of us aren't allowed to do much in our every day jobs. After all, what would my legal editors say were I to playfully make up a lot of amusing new laws for my next jurisprudence article?

Making up stories is one thing, but contriving for readers to also be able to join in and enjoy these fictions is something else. That's where the labor comes in. It's necessary to ferret out overused phrases, passive voice (I'm forever falling into the passive voice), and duplicated words, not to mention plugging an occasional hole in the plot. No matter how much I write, I still find myself occasionally employing empty adjectives. Yes, really, I actually do! Even after editorial comment and revision, the finished manuscript is never perfect, or anywhere near, but it is much better. At times I vow I will never again embark on such a project, but somehow I always do.


AND FINALLY

Canada has just celebrated its equivalent of Thanksgiving, reminding Mary of the British harvest festival.

It wasn't just celebrated in rural areas because even though she lived in the city they took a tin of peas or peaches to church for the harvest festival service. These offerings were lined up on the stone window bays interspersed with an occasional loaf of bred or even on one unforgettable occasion a small sheaf of corn. After the service, the edibles were distributed to the less well-off, a charitable effort that naturally led to jokes about most of the local congregation getting their donated tins back.

There was not much tree colour to be seen there in October, since apart from a park several blocks away and a flattened, grassed-over tip about the same distance in the other direction, the only greenery close by was in the cemetery at the top of the street or on various bomb sites left for years after the war. The latter became unofficial rubbish dumps, which in summer displayed vivid yellow and red patches of coltsfoot, dandelion, and rosebay willow herb, but by October rusty bed frames, wheel-less prams, old sinks, discarded paint tins, and the like would again emerge from the undergrowth as these plants died away and winter began its journey down Scotswood Road.

The imminent advent of winter was also heralded when folk started to routinely get up to intricate, feathery patterns of frosty branches covering the insides of windows. These beautiful creations of Jack Frost also reminded the forgetful that it was time to get coal stocks replenished for the winter months. Thus you might say winter was heralded in black and white, and appropriately more black and white will come your way on December l5 when the next edition of Orphan Scrivener trundles into view.

Best wishes,
Mary and Eric
who invite you to visit their home page, which hangs out on the virtual washing line that is the aether at

Friday, August 15, 2003

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER ISSUE # TWENTY-TWO l5 AUGUST 2003

In writing about midsummer, William Cullen Bryant uncannily described our current conditions, speaking as he does of, among other things, maize fainting under torrid sunshine, panting cows, and dead fish in hot streams.

As it must be for most of our subscribers, our local weather continues to sizzle, although due to several recent torrential outbursts when rain came down like the proverbial stair-rods, vegetation, leaves and lawns have all turned emerald green, an eerie sight bearing in mind that normally at this time of year they'd be coated in dust from the gritty clouds that follow anything moving at more than a snail's pace.

Ignoring the thermometer, we measure how hot is it chez maywrite by the number of pots of coffee drunk each day. This has halved during the past week or so, regrettable though that news may be to growers of coffee beans. Doubtless it's much the same at your house, so perhaps now's the time to put down the blinds, grab a cool drink, and dive right into this edition of Orphan Scrivener.


ERIC'S BIT or WOOD YOU BELIEVE IT?

Around here summer has become our prime writing season.

Our current deadline is toward summer's end, so Mary and I have spent a large portion of these past three months lurking about in ancient Constantinople. I'm not sure that the unseasonable cold and snow John suffered through in Four For A Boy might not have been related to the endless series of 90 degree plus days we experienced while writing it last summer, but we've been making a heroic effort in Five For Silver to keep the weather at bay. It's shaping up as the only novel thus far in which it doesn't rain at all, let alone most of the time.

Rain cooperatively stayed away a while ago when I took a break from hiking Byzantine byways seeking elusive murderers to hiking the woods in a three-strong team in search of orienteering control flags during my traditional annual R.O.G.A.I.N.E. The acronym is said by some to stand for Rugged Outdoor Group Activity Involving Navigation and Endurance. (Others claim it's the initials of the Aussies who invented the sport.) Basically, we trekked around for six hours, trying to locate features circled on a detailed topographical map -- stream junctions, boulders, hilltops, ponds -- which are marked on the actual spot by an orange and white flag, from which hangs a coded punch you use on your score card to prove you've been there.

I was a little surprised to arrive at the meet site at all. Attempted attendance of earlier orienteering activities began in mid-March with a journey of approximately twenty feet into a snowbank, continued on through several weeks of lack of transportation due to the demise of my eighteen year-old car, were followed by a couple of severe thunderstorms which mitigated against 7 hour round trips, and ended in an attempt cut short when my new (to me) pickup truck overheated fifteen miles from the house.

If this run of events was Fortuna's way of telling me to give up orienteering, she had apparently changed her mind because we found our way unerringly to all our targeted locations, until very near the end. The area we traversed was mountainous, with woods and farms. Hilltop fields offered spectacular vistas. Deeper in the woods we were treated to views of narrow, stream filled ravines.

We followed our usual strategy -- go slow, don't get lost, get back on time. It worked brilliantly. We strolled to the finish with fifteen minutes to spare, while the only other team in our division visited twice as many controls as we did, but came racing in twenty minutes late. They therefore lost most of their points, making us the WINNERS!

When I resumed writing Five For Silver, I found myself mapping out plausible routes for John to take around Constantinople. To get to the Church of the Holy Apostles from the northeast he might cut down past the Aqueduct of Valens, then walk up the Mese. Being cognizant that the eastern capital, like Rome, was a city built on seven hills when John spends a day searching for people he wants to interview, I made sure he took a route which sent him along the ridge overlooking the Golden Horn, conserving energy, rather than climbing up and down the steep streets.

Which brings me to wonder, and not for the first time, how much of what we think we're creating really arises from what's going on around us while we're writing.


NECESSARY EVIL or THE BSP TICKER

FOURFER PREVIEWED or JOHN IN WICKED COMPANY

Earlier this month, Four For A Boy was chosen for preview by the Wicked Company Book Club. The WCBC emails extracts from a particular book every day for a week, along with commentary and snippets from interviews with the writers. For further information or to consult their archive of book extracts, point your clicker at http://www.wickedcompany.net Our thanks to the WCBC for including John in its wicked circle.

WOO WOO INCIDENT or THE PRESSES STOPPED

Not to give too much away, but there's a fair bit about oracles in Five For Silver, so we're not sure what it means that as we started writing the last paragraph (of the first draft at least) most of the northeast power grid went down.

Here, the effect was merely to dim the lights and temporarily turn off the computer and coffee pot, but during the blackout of 1977 Eric was living in Brooklyn, New York. The east-facing windows in the fifth floor walk-up looked out over the entire expanse of Brooklyn. In the far distance could be seen the red lights on the Verrazano Narrows Bridge, twinkling like Christmas decorations. The evening when the squirrel gnawed its way into infamy at the substation, Eric recalls he happened to be looking out the window and so saw when the countless thousands of lights, stretching as far as the eye could see, flickered on and off, as if they were on a single circuit, and then went out. Even the lights on the bridge disappeared. When you see every light in Brooklyn go out at once, you know you have a problem.

This time, though, the computer was rebooted, the coffee reperked and the final paragraph retyped as it had been previously written.

We just hope we hadn't been handed a critical judgment from Fortuna.


MARY'S BIT or HOW DARE YOU CALL ME THAT?

Constantinople knows our protagonist as John the Eunuch, reminding us that the custom of nicknaming rulers and those holding high office is one of those fascinating practices interwoven for centuries into the unfolding tapestry of history.

Thus British schoolchildren are soon familiar with such royal luminaries as Alfred the Great, stout-hearted defeater of Danish invaders and alleged burner of a goodwife's cakes while contemplating battle plans, not to mention Richard the Lionheart, who spent more time abroad than he did in England -- and even when he was home had to deal with his revolting brother John Lackland (see below). Then there were the murdered Edward the Martyr, regarded as a saint, and pious Edward the Confessor, who among other things supervised the reconstruction of Westminster Abbey.

William the Conqueror we'll just ignore.

Yet lest we be accused of remembering only the good, consider also those rulers known by less complimentary nicknames, such as Ethelred the Unready, much harried by those troublesome, forever invading Danes, and the aforementioned John Lackland, also known as Bad King John. This latter dishonour is perhaps not entirely undeserved given his actions, which notably included conspiring to seize the crown from his brother Richard the Lionheart while the latter was away on a crusade. Excommunicated by Pope Innocent III at one point, there's also the matter of John's loss of the crown jewels while crossing the marshy land of a North Sea bay, thus proving that not everything comes out of The Wash.

For all that, in general John seems to have been one of those names often connected with valiant deeds. Thus at various times we hear of Johns who are Victorious (he enlarged his duchy by force of arms, although ironically he was to die from a wound sustained in a tournament) and Fearless (a Burgundian duke who, having fought the Turks, been captured and ransomed, returned home where he waged war against his fellow countryman and was finally assassinated by the Dauphin's bodyguard)

Then there was the Portugese king John the Fortunate, although one might argue the nickname is appropriate since despite its war with Spain, his country did not achieve independence until about a decade after his death. On the other hand, John the Perfect, another Portugese ruler, was certainly misnamed in that he personally murdered a duke accused of conspiracy.

As far as our protagonist John's time is concerned, history remembers his ruler as Justinian the Great, although unfortunately another John, the historian John of Ephesus, records that the empress was commonly called Theodora from the brothel.

But presumably not to her face.


AND FINALLY

Another thing to be faced cannot be completely unexpected, in that our subscribers will already have come to the horrible realization that the next issue of Orphan Scrivener will trundle into their email in-boxes on l5th October. We can only trust by then the current unforgiving red and burning eye in the sky will be emulating those meek and brief suns about which William Cullen Bryant wrote in another poem, this time welcoming that very month.

If not, though, we may well adopt a rather clever people-cooler Mary and her younger sister devised when they were children living in the inner city. Tying a broom to the top of the outside staircase, they suspended a colander from this broom, ran a hosepipe from the cold water tap in the kitchen (it was in fact the only tap, there being no hot water plumbed in) to the colander, turned on the water, and then took turns standing in their scratchy wool one-piece bathing suits under their makeshift shower.

Having described this easily constructed heat-beater perhaps we should now hastily depart to purchase stock in manufacturers producing brooms, colanders and hosepipes before everyone beats us to it, In any event, we'll see you again in October, a month when seasonal illustrations depict broom-riding witches, a group who are also allegedly fond of going to sea in sieves, those second cousins to colanders.

Best wishes, Mary and Eric
who invite you to visit their home page, hanging out on the virtual washing line that is the aether at http://home.epix.net/~maywrite/

Therein you'll find the usual suspects, including more personal essays and an interactive game as well as an on-line jigsaw puzzle (at least if you have a java-enabled browser) featuring One For Sorrow's boldly scarlet cover. For those new to the subscription list there's also the Orphan Scrivener archive, so don't say you weren't warned!


Sunday, June 15, 2003

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER -- ISSUE # TWENTY-ONE -- l5 JUNE 2003

William Blake can declaim all he wants about beholding summer with joy, but given the dreadful heat currently half suffocating the eastern coast, a glance at the humidity hanging in white veils all over our lime-green landscape so strongly suggests the Amazonian rain forest that we almost expect to see a monkey swing by on an orange-flowered cat's claw vine or hear the mournful trumpet of a grazing elephant somewhere in the steamy distance. Of course, since elephants are not generally found in the vicinity of the Amazon, readers should feel free to put that last remark down to literary licence aka the writer's fig leaf.

We're more in agreement with Rossiter Johnson's thoughts as conveyed in Ninety-Nine In The Shade, wherein he longs for a dwelling in a cucumber garden, a couple of icebergs, or even a holiday trip to the north pole. Since the thermometer has yet to reach that high, although doubtless it will, Oscar, it will, we have not taken to lounging about on deck chairs or arranging a fortnight's sojourn in colder climes. Instead, we've been labouring away over our June newsletter -- and so now here it is, hot off the press.


MARY'S BIT or CHANGING A BATHROOM WASHER

When Eric declared he needed a crowbar we realised that changing a bathroom washer was not going to be an easy task. And it didn't help that we had only two hammers and a pair of semi-stripped screwdrivers to do the job.

Lest readers think that employing a hammer to repair a tap is somewhat excessive, I should reveal that the item in question was, in fact, a washing machine and our problem (apart from the fact it had conked out and could not be repaired) was that it was too wide to get out the bathroom door.

The laundry machine in question was a twenty or so years old Harvest Gold behemoth, and it was obvious that to get it in there the bathroom door and part of the wall had had to be removed. Not being builders, we decided it would be simpler to dismantle the washer in situ and haul it out piece-meal rather than start tearing down walls.

I was reminded of Bernard Cribbins' comical song about Fred and a pair of his friends struggling to move something not actually specified, although it was definitely very large and from its described encrustations has always struck me as likely being of Victorian vintage. Anyhow, they have such a terrible time of it that at one point Charlie, one of Fred's helpers, suggests taking off the thing's handles and candle-holders and then using a couple of ropes to accomplish the job. To no avail.

We thought we'd come up with an inventive solution, even without the cups of tea Fred and company endlessly imbibed while considering their difficulties. However, when we began to dismantle the washer we discovered they sure made them to last in those days. It took an hour with hammers and screwdrivers before we managed to remove the back portion holding the timer and other controls along with the top containing the lid and the front panel. Getting the latter off revealed that the drum was attached to yards of wiring and piping and switches and such, to free it from which took a fair amount of labour.

The drum was by far the washer's heaviest part and therefore caused the most trouble, because being held in place by its own weight and four huge springs that could have launched a 747 did they form a catapulting device, it was a terrible struggle to get the quartet of metal coils sufficiently out of shape to unhook the drum. But with minimal bloodshed we managed to pull it off, turned the washer on its side, and triumphantly rolled the drum out of the bathroom.

This left a somewhat dented metal cube to be extracted from the bathroom. We tried the getting-a-couch-around-a-door-post manouevre, but the frame was just an inch or two too wide no matter how we angled it.

Inspiration struck! If we could somehow make one side narrower we could get the frame out using that particular side as the leading edge. But how to do that, you may well ask. Well, we reasoned, sinnce the bar bracing the side panels runs from corner to corner across the front, if it could be hammered into a v-shape -- the front panel itself having already been removed as mentioned -- this in turn would pull the side panels in towards each other and thus narrow their width just enough to be able to get the wretched thing out through the currently impassable doorway.

So it turned out to be.

It was when we brought the new apartment-sized washer home that we discovered although we had carefully measured the width of the bathroom door we had completely overlooked extra inches added when the washer was packed and boxed. So we could not get it in through the front door. However, since a passing kindly downpour was steadily reducing the cardboard packaging back to its original pulp, we eventually wrassled it inside, soggy but triumphant. The washer cleared the bathroom doorway with an inch to spare -- and it didn't need any encouraging taps with a hammer to help it along either.

Just in case you're wondering, Fred and his colleagues also tried taking the mysterious item's feet and seat off, but that didn't help either. Neither did removing the door, walls *and* ceiling so in the end whatever it was was left on the landing.


NECESSARY EVIL or THE BSP TICKER

Only three items on the ticker this time, but talk about news!

LIST TO THIS NEWS or FOUR FOR A SURPRISE

We were honoured indeed to hear in May that this year's Mystery Showcase edition of the American Library Association's Booklist Magazine included John's adventures on its Best Little-Known Series list. Only four series were named, the other three being written by Beth Saulnier (Alex Bernier), Jess Walter (Caroline Mabry) and Ed Gorman (Sam McCain).

WRITING TOGETHER or UNEXPECTED COMPANY

We learnt just as we dragged Orphan Scrivener off to press that a revised edition of The Elements of Mystery Fiction: Writing a Modern Whodunit (edited by William G. Tapply) will appear from Kalmbach Publishing in 2004 -- and further that Hallie Ephron's chapter on how writing teams collaborate mentions some of our meanderings on that very topic. And talk about being in good company! Multi-headed authors examined include Ellery Queen, Per Wahloo and Maj Sjowall. Our thanks to Hallie for including us in such august company.

FOURFER REVIEWS or JOHN SEES STARS

We are happy to report that Four For a Boy has received *starred* reviews from both Publishers Weekly and Booklist. "Written with humor and pathos, this superior historical is sure to please existing fans and send new ones in search of the rest of the series" according to PW, while Booklist's David Pitt says "At some point, every great series needs an "origin story," and this one's a real corker."

John's elderly servant Peter will now circulate among you offering cups of raw Egyptian wine. 8-}


ERIC'S BIT or BORDERING ON FICTION

Poisoned Pen Press provides a map of Constantinople at the front of each of our books. It's a nice touch. There's a print-out of such a map sitting on my desk and already I've marked in red pen the places John is visiting as we write the fifth novel, trying to envision what route he might take, how long a walk it would be, what he'd pass along the way, and whether he could see the Marmara or the Golden Horn.

Maps have always fascinated me. By itself a map is a scale model of the world. A series of maps can tell a visual story. When I was a kid I loved to draw successive maps of imaginary worlds. Countries would appear, grow, wither away. Empires would rise, wash across bizarrely shaped continents and then recede. Maybe I was inspired by maps of the ancient world and especially of Rome, born a speck of a city state, growing to encompass the Mediterranean, before gradually dying, shrinking away once again into the single besieged city of Constantinople.

My friends and I enacted history by playing board games. RISK allowed us to spread armies of markers across a map of the world, taking over one country after another, nicely mimicking the manner in which a proper empire, like Rome, should grow. We much preferred, however, the long forgotten SUMMIT. This was also played out on a map, but the goal was to exert combinations of economic influence, military power and popular support in as many countries as possible. Colorful plastic tokens created a nice graphical representation of one's attempts at world domination. I can't recall exactly, but I think if you triggered a nuclear war, you lost.

Although maps of the ancient world are fascinating they are also misleading. Drawn the same way as modern maps with the same precise boundaries, they give the impression of being documentary, yet they are really, like movies of the week, oversimplified, more cartographic fiction than reality. In the ancient world borders were not as clear cut as they are today and notions of political control were not the same. To envision Rome as a nation state would be as anachronistic as imagining Justinian composing new laws on a laptop.

The parts of a map colored as The Eastern Roman Empire differed considerably more than, say, California and Maine. In the capital itself, being part of the Empire meant regulations even down to making certain new construction didn't obstruct someone's view of the sea, while in Africa Roman control tended not to extend outside the cities and Egypt was pretty much allowed to retain its heretical religious views.

It strikes me the lines on the maps didn't mean as much to the people living in those times. Long before Rome "fell" in 476, Italy was in the hands of German military commanders, who were content to allow Romans to run the civil administration. Our maps today show a huge change when the pretense of Roman control was dispensed with -- Italy suddenly thrust outside the sturdy border of the Empire, its land turned the color of barbarism. Yet the lives of most in Italy didn't alter. More were probably affected by the bloody wars over the "boundaries" than the actual change.

Relations between the East and West continued. Borders weren't closed, walls didn't go up. An official like Cassiodorus could spend the first part of his career advising Theodoric, the Gothic king of Italy -- who paid lip service to affiliation with the Eastern Empire -- and the latter part in Constantinople. Although Gaul was by now far removed from the map of Rome, Theodoric had extended his influence there in the early 500's and an official from his court, where Roman style administration was still maintained, sent to administer a part of Gaul would probably not have noticed what is now such a prominent cartographic difference.

The actual boundaries of Constantinople are, on the other hand, quite clear. The massive, outer land walls erected by Theodosius, with its towers and moat, still exists. Unfortunately, little else does. A typical map of the ancient capital shows the forked Mese -- the Main Street of the Eastern Roman Empire -- dotted by a few forums, the Great Church, the Hippodrome, and the general location of the Great Palace. Of the streets John walked, let alone all the twisty, dark alleys he and his friends still insist on frequenting even though they really should know better, there remains hardly a trace. Aside from the Mese there survives no fragment of a street longer than 100 meters. Scholars are attempting to recreate a street grid by reference to remaining monuments and ruins. The actual location of well known buildings is sometimes conjectural and even the size of famous public spaces like the Augustaion -- of which nothing survives -- is a matter of dispute.

Still, I love looking at maps, no matter that ancient ones might purport to show more than is actually known. The De Imperatoribus Romanis website at http://www.roman-emperors.org/Index.htm has a wonderful series of maps of the Roman Empire at 100 year intervals from 01 to 1453 AD. If, on the other hand, you want to play with maps, try out this "ancient" (1986) freeware computer game, The Annals of Rome, at http://www.the-underdogs.org/game.php?id=59. Thanks to the lack of computer graphics at the time it is little more than a map on which you can, one hopes, manage to expand your territory just as the emperors did, by appointing the right commanders and allocating armies and resources wisely. Unfortunately, in the game as in actual history, the Germans and Persians keep coming. Alas, like the emperors, I fought history and history won.


AND FINALLY

Romans celebrated the festival of Cardea at the beginning of June, honouring her as goddess of thresholds, hinges, locks and doors as well as one who possessed the power to close or open that which was open or shut. So it's only fitting we close this June newsletter by noting that having reached our twenty-first edition, Orphan Scrivener has now formally come of age. In the UK in former times it would therefore have been presented with an oversized cardboard silver key such as British 2l year olds received on the day -- and also perhaps even tossed up and down the appropriate number of times in a blanket.

However, in most US states the age of majority is now l8 and so instead of a quick chorus of 2l Today (the traditional serenade declaring the birthday honoree had now officially received the key to the door, never having been 2l before) we'll have to content ourselves with closing this landmark issue by locking it down for transmission with a closing reminder that the next Orphan Scrivener will flap through your email door on l5th August. See you then!

Best wishes
Mary and Eric

who invite you to visit their home page, hanging out on the virtual washing line that is the aether at

http://home.epix.net/~maywrite/

Therein you'll find the usual suspects, including more personal essays and an interactive game as well as an on-line jigsaw puzzle (at least if you have a java-enabled browser) featuring One For Sorrow's boldly scarlet cover. For those new to the subscription list there's also the Orphan Scrivener archive, so don't say you weren't warned!


Tuesday, April 15, 2003

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER ISSUE # TWENTY l5 APRIL 2003

Like the spectre at the feast or the skeleton in the cupboard, there lurks in many a corner tonight the ghastly thought that the deadline for the timely filing of US tax returns is well and truly upon us. That mild man Lewis Carroll probably shared the feeling, since when he listed an eclectic collection of things he hated he included three folk under one umbrella, spiders, gout and the income tax. And now, alas, as if American subscribers had not already suffered enough with April l5th being Tax Day of Doom, here comes this edition of Orphan Scrivener. Hopefully it will distract readers for a while -- or else drive them to distraction. Either way, feel free to stop chewing your pencil, put aside the aspirin and instruction booklets and dive right in!

ERIC'S BIT or A FEW THOUGHTS ON WRITING

Recently I read Stephen King's ON WRITING. His thoughts were of interest me because he's one of my favorite authors, not to mention one of the great writers of our time

In my opinion.

Not everyone agrees. I knew a fellow with a literary bent but no publisher, for whom the name Stephen King was the epitome of opprobrium. "It's no wonder good writers can't get published anymore, with all these bestselling hacks like Stephen King out to make a buck," he'd say.

I, on the other hand, am pretty sure that if I could write half as well as Stephen King, John the Eunuch would be a household name and people would be reading the books Mary and I write a century or more from now, just as they'll still be reading King and Dickens, another famous hack.

I believe King's books will stand the test of time better than almost all the literary fiction produced in the past fifty years. They deal with a basic human concern, a subject that isn't a passing fad, and one that has particularly poignancy for our era -- fear.

In his first inaugural address President Franklin Roosevelt told Americans they had nothing to fear but fear itself. Given the advances in human knowledge and abilities, he was right. Mankind finally has the wherewithal to vanquish disease, starvation, ignorance, injustice. Yet for the past half century we've been driven blindly on by a succession of fears. Reds under our beds, juvenile delinquents, missile gaps, crime, drugs, Japan buying up all the real estate in America (remember that one?) There was a time in the sixties when more than a few parents seemed to be afraid of their own idealistic kids. How much more could have been accomplished if we hadn't expended so much energy and so many resources on compiling black lists and building back yard fallout shelters and waging wars on shadows? Out of fear. Today, of course, its terror we're instructed to be afraid of -- fear itself -- the very thing Roosevelt warned us was most destructive of all.

I'm not saying that Stephen King has in mind to pontificate about any of this -- that's just me. He'd probably say it was nonsense. Actually he'd put it more pungently. Still, I don't think it's a coincidence that his primary subject fascinates our fear-shackled society.

So I wanted to know what Stephen King had to say about writing.

Nothing startling, it turned out. Nothing much different from what any teacher might have told me. Or what I might've told myself. As King admits, "Fiction writers, present company included, don’t understand very much about what they do-not why it works when it’s good, not why it doesn’t when it’s bad."

No kidding. Probably that's why I'm practically shaking every time I open up a new blank document.

Still, it was fascinating to see what he thought was important and what was not and which of the familiar techniques and bits of advice on which he chose to focus. I couldn't help comparing his manner of writing to what Mary and I do.

One big difference is that King doesn't like outlines. Mary and I write the John novels from detailed outlines because we can't think of how else to keep everything in order while co-writing a mystery. If we were to write individually I would still use an outline but Mary wouldn't. Oddly, King mentions INSOMNIA as one of the few books for which he used an outline. He doesn't like it much, but it's a favorite of mine.

On the other hand, King approaches those literary darlings, symbolism and theme, almost exactly as Mary and I do. For King symbolism and theme are not carefully concocted literary tricks, but simply things which are revealed as he unearths the story and which, when he notices them, he proceeds to polish and enhance, not to impress critics, but to enrich the reader's experience. Which is exactly what Mary and I do. As a book nears completion we will add a scene here and a paragraph there, to highlight some interesting thread we've noticed.

Wow. We're doing something right! That's encouraging.

I'm sure there are those who will sneer that there's nothing to be learned from a popular author because if the writing were good the masses wouldn't buy it. There are probably others who would counter that the only writing they consider "good" is writing that sells.

Both are wrong. Good writing sells, but sales are not the sole measure of good writing. I can't know for certain, but I doubt that many writers, even bestselling ones, are thinking about dollars all the time they are writing, any more than Sammy Sosa is thinking about how much he's earning every time he swings a baseball bat.

Not surprisingly, King nails it when he says that the most important thing about writing is "the language." Certainly. That's the raw material, the essence. That's what we are concentrating on. Trying to find the right word, shape the perfect sentence. At the end of the day some have written books that will bring in a fortune, but that isn't what it is about.

I must say, though, as much as I love Stephen King's books, and wish him all the success in the world (and how can't you like a guy who loves both baseball and the Ramones?) still I kind of hope he won't start writing historical mysteries. I might never be able to approach my word processor again!


NECESSARY EVIL or THE BSP TICKER

The BSP Ticker's taken the day off, since there's no news to pass along this time, alas. Will Try To Do Better Next Time. Next Time. In the meantime, however, we can remind you that books one to three of the John the Eunuch series are available in trade paperback, while two to four are out in hardback. You may also find some of our stories in various anthologies such as The Mammoth Book of Egyptian Whodunnits.


MARY'S BIT or REEDS AS RENT

Some years ago I asked a person at the IRS if they ever accepted items in lieu of taxes, after the ancient fashion of quit-rents. Rather startled, she replied they did not, not realising I was pulling the collective legs of the Service, I being at the time young and unskillful (though not, per Kipling, a gambling kid ordained to be sold).

Having emerged this very morning from a hand-to-hand struggle to wrassle this year's tax returns to the floor, while gloomily contemplating cheques to go with them I found myself recalling that long ago conversation and thereby began musing about so-called peppercorn rents.

I must say I find it an attractive notion, especially when quit-rents really are tendered in peppercorns.

Trinity Church on New York's Broadway paid 279 of them to Elizabeth II on the occasion of her l976 visit to the church, this being one for each year since William III decreed their rent would be one peppercorn a year. Presumably the Crown waived interest on the arrearage, seeing as it was Bicentennial year. Similarly, in St George, Bermuda, every April the Freemason Lodge hands over a single peppercorn to the governor as payment for its use of the State House. Talk about a bargain rent!

On the other hand, the government charges the Cayman Islands National Museum an annual rent of a coil of locally produced thatch rope. Unfortunately the record appears silent as to what happens to these lengths of rope once they pass into the landlords' hands -- perhaps they just hang about in an official warehouse somewhere?

Like coils of rope, some quit-rents were originally vastly more useful to property owners than they are nowadays. Consider that each year in London the City Solicitor hands over six enormous horseshoes of the type used for knights' chargers -- apparently these particular specimens are over 500 years old -- plus an appropriate number of nails to a representative of the Crown. The ironmongery is payment for leasing certain ancient land, although it's said nowadays nobody is certain where the property is actually situated although it's thought to be in the Chancery Lane area.

You might think that this sort of unusual rent would become increasingly difficult to find each year given that such horseshoes are scarce on the ground not to mention the hoof these days, but in fact the City Solicitor overcomes the problem with ease. After he's handed the rent to the Crown representative and it's been solemnly counted and accounted for, the City Solicitor takes horseshoes and nails back and keeps them for next year's "payment"!

Flowers are a popular form of quit-rent. For example, each June a landlord in Leicester pays four old pennies and one rose to the mayor as rent for the Crown and Thistle pub. One's sense of the fitness of things might be outraged that a rose and not a thistle forms part of this annual payment, but on the other hand whereas those sweet-scented blooms are fairly easy to find in mid-summer, as time passes old pennies must surely be getting more and more difficult to scratch up. It's always possible that eventually the Crown and Thistle's rent might be changed to, say, half a print of best bitter and a rose, an eminently practical solution if so.

Another homely quit-rent involves the Covent Garden Area Trust. Since the early l990s an annual payment of a apple and a posy has been levied each June on the Trust's tenants, which include the famous fruit and vegetable market and nearby associated historic buildings such as several houses in a Georgian terrace as well as a block that includes the London Transport Museum.

So the seemingly absurd idea of handing over flowers or rope or spices to pay one's taxes -- which we might characterise as rent for the privilege of working -- is not that far fetched, although admittedly the problem of storing all that stuff might well prove unsurmountable. More importantly for the individual, though, is how would the IRS know who paid with what rose if the Service subsequently had an axe to grind with the hapless taxpayer?

All well and good, you may say, but what about the header to this section? Well, since l958 a reed has been presented annually to the Royal Hospital School in Holbrook, Norfolk, as payment for villagers' recreational use of the school's Reade Field, thus proving the British, as well as the Byzantines, are fond of puns.

Unfortunately it's pounds, not puns, the British equivalent of the IRS would like to see.


AND FINALLY

Not to tax your patience any longer, we'll bring this edition to a close with the observation that the next newsletter will sneak into your email in-box on June l5th, St Vitus' Day. Among other things the saint is commonly invoked against oversleeping, dog bites, storms and lightning. However, we trust when Orphan Scrivener 2l arrives two months from today it'll be the only disaster with which you must cope on that particular date. See you then!

Best wishes
Mary and Eric

who invite you to visit their home page, hanging out on the virtual washing line that is the aether at

http://home.epix.net/~maywrite/

Therein you'll find the usual suspects, including more personal essays and an interactive game as well as an on-line jigsaw puzzle (at least if you have a java-enabled browser) featuring One For Sorrow's boldly scarlet cover. For those new to the subscription list there's also the Orphan Scrivener archive, so don't say you weren't warned!


Wednesday, February 19, 2003

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER ISSUE # NINETEEN l5 FEBRUARY 2003

If Will Shakespeare had been living on the east coast this winter, we wonder if he'd have had a character in Much Ado About Nothing need to ask why someone had a "February face", to wit, one that was frosty, cloudy and stormy. Most coastal residents have had drifts of snow heaped about in greater or lesser amounts and for varying lengths of time since early December, although we count ourselves fortunate in having to deal with only two episodes of frozen pipes -- so far.

Still, it's an ill wind that freezes your plumbing. Local ponds have been thronged with ice fishermen, whose little shelters and flaring lanterns can be seen as late as midnight on occasion, even though it would surely be easier to purchase piscine portions at the grocery store. Just seeing them out there on the windswept ice made most passersby shiver.

Continuing with the theme of chilling the marrows of innocent onlookers, we now present this latest edition of Orphan Scrivener. Please dress warmly before proceeding.


MARY'S BIT or BAAAAA'D CRIMES

We recently heard that a copy of Two For Joy has gone missing from a library out west and are not certain whether to consider the event a left-handed compliment from someone who could not bear to part with the book or an act intended to protest against the Michaelites' belief in the Quadrinity rather than the Trinity.

However, Twofer's strange disappearance turned my thoughts to thefts in general. Some have obvious motives, such as when Les Miz's Jean Valjean stole a loaf of bread for his starving nephew. In such cases the loot soon disappears, and thus we can be fairly certain those responsible for recent Italian hijackings of lorry loads of dried cod (and in one case a haul of frozen swordfish and octopus) and the light-fingered Larries who ran off with over seventy lambs belonging to a Yorkshire farmer disposed of the evidence quickly, either on their own dinner table or someone else's.

Similarly, whoever contrived to steal 32,000 pigs ears from a pet food store in Denmark this month presumably had a ready market of dog owners keen to get a few cut-price treats for their pets -- although one wonders how so many boxes could have been removed from the emporium without someone noticing the activity.

Occasionally apprehended culprits reveal unusual reasons for what might otherwise remain inexplicable thefts. Take a Russian case a couple of years ago. Two citizens went out one night and stole a set of traffic lights. Unfortunately, as they hauled them away the pair met a local administration pooh-bah so were nabbed, as you might say, red, yellow and green handed. Their motive? It seems they intended to use the traffic lights to provide disco type illumination for a party.

In the same category we might put the Thai taxi driver caught stealing road signs. Apparently he planned to sell them to a scrap dealer in order to pay his gambling debts, having bet on Korea to win the 2002 World Cup.

But for lovers of mystery fiction, it's the unknown motives for odd thefts that are intriguing and perhaps might even inspire a short story or two.

When a German monument to Stalin was dismantled in l96l, one of the workers involved kept an ear. The bronze auracular organ was subsequently displayed in a local history exhibition at a Berlin cafe, but disappeared last year and hasn't been seen since.

. Similarly, five years ago the head of Copenhagen's harbour's famous Mermaid statue was returned anonymously two days after it was removed. Perhaps those responsible were disappointed to discover it wasn't the original tete, which was stolen in the mid l960s and never recovered. Indeed, the sculpture seems to have become a regular target for vandalism since someone also sawed off one of its arms in l983.

Then there was the strange disappearance of half a dozen mercury bulbs stolen from old style thermostats during renovation work on a building at Princeton University. Or how about the burglars who broke into a German kindergarten and, ignoring computers and the petty cash, ran off with nothing but Legos -- including one used as a substitute leg for an listing alarm clock?

In closing, I should add my current favourite in the odd theft category is last December's heist of a donated Christmas tree -- its decorations appropriately including strings of red lights -- from a Dutch city's bordello district. It hardly seems in the spirit of the season, but perhaps it was intended as a protest. It was certainly a well planned operation, seeing as the perpetrator(s) could be certain there'd be plenty of other goings-on in the area to distract possible witnesses from the tree-napping.


NECESSARY EVIL or THE BSP TICKER

This time around we've a fair bit of news to trumpet forth, so let's get to it!

HOW JOHN REGAINED HIS FREEDOM or BEWARE THE GOURD

We'll be all over the landscape on l5th February since the day brings not only the latest newsletter, but is also the official publication date for Four For A Boy *and* the paperback edition of Three For A Letter.

Fourfer is a prequel, revealing details of that oft hinted-at investigation for Justinian whereby John regained his freedom and in the process set his well-worn boots on the road to high office.

It is 525 and the empire is still ruled by Justinian's ailing uncle, Justin. It's obvious that Justin is dying and while Justinian and Theodora plot in the wings, riots and terror engulf Constantinople. This bloodshed is as much the result of the actions of forces commanded by the brutal City Prefect (nicknamed the Gourd) as from those of the Blues, elegant young thugs whose escalating depredations are petrifying the city populace.

But were the Blues really responsible for the daylight murder of a wealthy philanthropist in the Great Church, or have Justinian's enemies seized a chance to pin the death on him and thus prevent his ascension to a throne that will soon be empty? The still enslaved John and his reluctant co- investigator Felix (here a rank and file excubitor, although assigned to Justin's personal guard) are ordered to unravel the mystery and find out what's going on.

Fourfer also relates how John met other familiar characters such as Madam Isis, Gaius the physician, and that rash boy Anatolius. You'll also recognise certain unnamed personages you've met before -- including one hidden under a veil during her brief appearance, and another whose circumstances are touched upon in passing in the same chapter.

MURDER IN BYZANTIUM or CONSTANTINOPLE SERENADE

We're delighted to report that One For Sorrow's Greek edition appeared in December, sporting a different title -- Murder in Byzantium -- and a new cover featuring a quartet of minstrels strolling around tootling away outside the city wall. Even if you don't speak Greek, you might like to glance at the cover art by pointing your clicker at http://www.govostis.gr

JOHN'S ADVENTURES FURTHER AFIELD or ROMAN IN THE GLOAMING

Locked room mysteries are particular favourites of ours, so it will be no surprise that John's next short detection involves investigation of a locked room murder at an inn situated in a largely deserted Rome -- while the city itself is "locked in", being under siege by the Goth army at the time. The Finger of Aphrodite will appear in The Mammoth Book of Ancient Roman Whodunnits, edited by Mike Ashley. MBoARW will be published in the UK this autumn with the US edition slated to appear shortly afterwards.


ERIC'S BIT or THE TWO HORSEMEN OF THE WRITERS' APOCALYPSE

Bad reviews. Along with rejections, they form the Two Horsemen of the Writers' Apocalypse. They're as inevitable as the Apocalypse as well. Once you start showing your writing to someone other than your mom, you're bound to get them.

The John the Eunuch novels have had a remarkable (almost preternatural) run of almost uniformly excellent reviews. Which doesn't make the occasional poor one sting any less.

With Four For A Boy, Mary and I finally garnered a *starred review* from Publishers Weekly, the veritable Holy Grail of reviews. In a demonstration of how different individual impressions can be, this heartening encomium occupied pride of place on the book's Amazon.com page for about a week until it was pushed down by a review noting in part that John spent the book going about in a pique.

It's hard to make sense of reviews sometimes. Characters one reviewer praises for being well-rounded and life-like, another will describe as cardboard. The problem, I think, is that there are truly no objective measures of writing, but we all have a temptation, borne perhaps of modesty, to put critical clothes on our personal likes and dislikes before sending them out into the world.

On the other hand, negative reviews can sometimes be thought-provoking. Last year, an Amazon.com customer referred to Sunilda, the Goth girl from Three For A Letter as "...the most unrealistic child figure since Macbeth's son." I suppose it's practically a compliment to be insulted by being compared to Shakespeare, but blush to admit since I had no recollection of Macbeth's son I wasn't sure exactly what we were supposed to have done wrong.

In my defense, the one experience I've had of Macbeth, which overrode all else, was thirty years ago, when I saw Christopher Walken play the role at the Mitzi E. Newhouse Theater at Lincoln Center. Every seat in that little place is practically on top of the stage in the center, and the power emanating from Walken's Macbeth as he stomped around on the metal grating that was about all there was to the stage set was palpable. At the time I had no idea who he was and, having witnessed that performance, I have to say I am amazed his later career has not done justice to his talent.

Perhaps Macbeth's son was edited out of that particular production or was just not memorable compared to Walken's embodiment of his father. I did some research and found the boy described at the University of Victoria's Internet Shakespeare Editions (http://web.uvic.ca/shakespeare/) as typical of Shakespeare's children, "precocious...simply miniature (slightly naive) adults." Since we had had one of our other characters describe eight year-old Sunilda (who regularly writes eloquent if peculiar letters to her Aunt Matasuntha in Ravenna) as a "monstrosity of precocity" I suppose this is what the reviewer found objectionable.

However, as the Shakespeare site points out, childhood as we know it did not exist in older times. Children matured faster, most especially children of high rank. So it is entirely possible the Bard knew what he was doing.

Certainly people grew up fast in sixth century Rome. Scholar James J. O'Donnell writes that Cassiodorus, whose Gothic History figures in Three For A Letter, might have been as young as eighteen when he became quaestor to the Italian Ostrogothic King Theodoric. It was the quaestor's job to draft laws and answer petitions, to put the desires of the monarch into words as effectively, eloquently and correctly as possible. When we read that Cassiodorus had attained this skill before he was out of his teens -- and had already worked for some time as a legal aide to his father, the praetorian prefect -- we decided it was not a reach to allow the royal hostage Sunilda to write well-composed letters to her aunt, as well as acting in a rather adult manner.

This explains why we appreciated Gene Stratton's remark in http://www.reviewingtheevidence.com/review.html?id=2223 that "One of the most interesting characterizations...is the young royal heir...Sunilda. A precocious child, wise beyond her years, Sunilda could be a model for Lewis Carroll's Red Queen in the Alice stories."

So as you can see, bad reviews can be educational, but having brought the subject up I have to say there are bad reviews and then there are, well, *really* bad reviews. At our website we link to practically every review of our books. I've begun to post excerpts from the most recent on the site's first page, but I will admit (to newsletter readers at least) I do draw a line as to what I will go out of my way to draw attention to, let alone maintain a permanent link for. If you really want to find a bad review there's always Google. Insert any author's name and search terms such as "cardboard", "stereotype", or "cliche" and then click.

As an *Orphan Scrivener Exclusive* I'll leave you with a recently received email critique, here reproduced verbatim and in its entirety:

"And for what it's worth, Mister Big Short writer, you're writing sucks."


AND FINALLY

It's three years this month since the first Orphan Scrivener trundled out into the aether. It hardly seems five minutes since we began writing them, but the months pass ever more and more quickly, leaving the distinct impression that we're all falling headlong down the Stairs of Time.

However, if we were indeed bumping down such a staircase, the Roman era would not be that many steps up behind us and on the subject, you may recall we mentioned in the last newsletter that Emperor Constantine's father died in York in 306. A Constant Correspondent wrote a few weeks ago noting that Emperor Septimius Severus also died there in 2ll and inquiring if a statue commemorating the departed ruler could be found in that fair city. So far as we've been able to ascertain, unfortunately there isn't. However, as a small consolation prize readers might like to glance at Canaletto's painting of the Arch of Septimius Severus at http://www.abcgallery.com/C/canaletto/canaletto53.html

Constant Correspondent's second question queried whether the Ebur Handicap was still run at York. Indeed it is. Founded in l843 and with a moniker preserving Eburacum, the Roman name for the city, this year's race will be held on 20th August. In his younger days Felix would doubtless have enjoyed a modest wager or two on the result!

Finally, whereas T. S. Eliot opened The Waste Land with his oft-quoted observation that April was the cruellest month, we now hasten to close this much less poetic offering by noting that while he obviously wasn't thinking of the double catastrophe lying in wait for American subscribers to Orphan Scrivener two months hence, his words are prophetic. For l5th April is not only the deadline for the timely filing of those annual two-aspirin headaches, IRS Form l040 and its supporting schedules, but is also the very day upon which our next newsletter will show up on your virtual doorstep.

Once you've wrassled your tax return into the postal system, therefore, you may wish to mentally fortify yourself for the next appearance of Orphan Scrivener in your email in-box on l5th April. See you then!

Best wishes
Mary and Eric

who invite you to visit their home page, hanging out on the virtual washing line that is the aether at

http://home.epix.net/~maywrite/

Therein you'll find the usual suspects, including more personal essays and an interactive game as well as an on-line jigsaw puzzle (at least if you have a java-enabled browser) featuring One For Sorrow's boldly scarlet cover. For those new to the subscription list there's also the Orphan Scrivener archive, so don't say you weren't warned!


THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER - ISSUE # ONE HUNDRED AND FORTY SIX - 15 APRIL 2024

We understand Virginia Woolf described letter-writing as the child of the penny post. How then to describe the parentage of emails? Whatever...