Thursday, June 15, 2000

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER - ISSUE # THREE - 15 JUNE 2000

This Orphan Scrivener darkens your email box a day early in case anyone wishes to investigate the mystery conference mentioned in the BSP section below. However, it's no mystery that tomorrow is the last day of the old Roman festival of Vestalia, honouring Vesta, goddess of the hearth. It was on June l5th that her priestesses, the Vestal Virgins, cleansed her shrine and threw its dust into the Tiber. Perhaps because of the connection between hearths and baking bread, the day was also a holiday for millers and bakers, who reportedly decorated their millstones (and the animals that worked to turn them) with garlands strung with little loaves and violets.

We rather like the notion, and since this issue is rather long - although it is more letter than news - perhaps it might be a plan to grab a sandwich before settling down to read on. although wearing violets is optional.

ERIC'S BIT or WHEN COTTON WAS KING

I love writing but I don't like trying to sell my writing. Not to to editors and agents when it's a manuscript and not to readers after it's been published. The whole process strikes me as slightly embarrassing. I always feel like I'm being pushy. Besides, I am a retiring sort. When I find myself on display at a table piled with books in the front of a bookstore I feel as lost and panicky as I imagine I would have at a high school dance had I ever dared attend one.

The obvious lesson is that writers are sometimes the kids who spent most of their time in their rooms reading books. Some of us become writers because we are loners. Because we are not salesperson material. And the requirements of today's marketplace, that writers publicize their works, can be onerous, given the kind of people some of us are.

Obvious, except when I was in grade school I wasn't at all shy about trying to make a buck - well, a quarter - off my literary efforts.

My biggest seller, on the playground at recess, was King Cotton. He was a series character, like John the Eunuch. During a fifth grade history lesson my teacher, Mrs. Hughes, had uttered the phrase "Cotton was king in the South" and for many years afterwards all I knew about the American Civil War was that it was something to do with cotton and the North won, because the moment I heard those magic words I was scribbling on my tablet a stick-limbed cotton boll wearing a crown and carrying a sword, naturally.

I used to spend a lot of time in grade school drawing cartoons in my tablet rather than learning long division, which was the sort of thing they taught in grade school back then, rather than trigonometry and calculus, believe it or not. These efforts would be passed around to my friends, to be greeted by muffled snickers or outright guffaws, usually depending on the degree of mayhem the characters were inflicting on each other. When Mrs. Hughes noticed the boisterous reaction to King Cotton and reprimanded us, I knew I had come up with a something of merit. Something that could be sold!

I began turning out King Cotton Comics, penciled on a couple sheets of folded and stapled tablet paper. The stories involved the doughty King and his arch foes, the nefarious six-armed Boll Weevils and the King's evil, bomb slinging brother William who grinned evilly and wore a floppy, evil-looking hat. I was able to draw the simple characters very quickly, and the frequent panels featuring merely a jagged explosion and a big KABOOM went even more quickly.

My friends and I proceeded to sell these masterpieces at recess. I had identified my potential market as those classmates who I figured I could follow about and pester without risking a pummeling. My method was pretty straightforward. "Wanna a comic? Only a dime. C'mon, only a dime. OK five cents. Aw c'mon, only five cents. Eight pages too. I'll even show you the cover before you buy it! C'mon. I'll let go of your swing if you buy one. It's really funny! I'll push your swing if you buy one."

Hard to believe from someone who trembles at the thought of offering a free bookmark at a book signing.

Our methods must have been effective because we were soon moving enough comics to keep us in licorice whips, jawbreakers and Bazooka Joe bubblegum. (Come to think of it, King Cotton was actually better drawn and funnier than Bazooka Joe comics) Success encouraged diversification. Before long Morgan the Talking Dog hit the playground market, followed brilliantly by Elmo the Talking Fish.

Then we came out with a premium line, in glorious Crayola color. Those sold for a quarter. Our final product turned out to be The King Cotton Giant Annual. Drawn on full-sized unfolded paper, it featured a space adventure. Unfortunately the spaceships and spacesuits wore down my scarce silver, gold and copper colored crayons so alarmingly that we decided not to part with the comic but to simply rent it. Which required us to erase the crossword puzzle for each new customer.

Spurred on by visions of pocketfuls of penny candy, several other grade school entrepreneurs rushed to begin their own independent publishing companies. But who would have preferred Colonel Corn over King Cotton? We weren't destined to find out because Mrs. Hughes decided all this rampant free enterprise was not suitable for a playground environment and banned our efforts all the way from the sliding board to the witch's hat. Kind of the Evil Chainstore of her times, was Mrs Hughes.

Since then I have not been so enthusiastic about pushing my writing, but Mary and I make our low-key efforts because the whole point of writing is that someone is going to read it. In a few days I will be at the Deadly Ink Mystery Conference and, to Patti Biringer, who invited me to be on a panel there, honest, I will try not to be shaking like a leaf the whole time! Hmmm, I wonder how many comics I could draw in the three days remaining before the conference?

NOTE: If you want to see what King Cotton looks like check out the King Cotton page. I don't have any of the drawings I did in fifth grade since the whole run sold out. However, I have done my best to recreate him with Windows Paintbox. Personally, I miss those big green pencils which were easier to manipulate than a mouse. Besides which, you can't chew on the end of the mouse until it it turns into a soft, tasty brush.


NECESSARY EVIL or THE BSP TICKER

"Two For Joy" has flapped off to Poisoned Pen Press and will be venturing out into the world in just a few months. Meantime, you may care to point your clicker at: http://www.poisonedpenpress.com/html/twoforjoy.html. TFJ's cover can be seen in glorious green and gold. Who are the two gents on the cover? All Will Be Revealed in October.

Mention of glorious, the Deadly Ink Mystery Conference is roaring up on us. While it's but vicious rumour that Eric will demonstrate lion fighting techniques, as noted above he'll be there to leap into the historical research panel arena, along with April Kihlstrom and Roberta Rogow (who'll also be wearing the moderator's hat). Other announced conference attendees are Jonathan Harrington, Irene Marcuse, Keith Snyder and Parnell Hall. Parnell's giving a luncheon talk entitled "If He Can Do It, Anybody Can", and we gather he's also promised to sing! DIMC will be from 8.30 am to 4.30 pm on June l7th at the Four Points Sheraton Hotel, Mt Arlington, New Jersey. It's not too late to get details - jot organiser Patti Biringer a line at pab@nac.net or give her a jingle at (973) 627 2786.

And speaking of speaking, another interview will appear, hanging out in the aether like the Northern Lights, on June 23rd. If you're interested, pop over to Cybergrrl and take a peek: http://www.cybergrrl.com/explorer.htm.

Finally, fellow Geordie Meg Chittenden wrote yesterday to reveal in her inimitable way that Mary's sandwiched between Ian Rankin and Eric in her Rogue's Gallery: http://www.techline.com/~megc/rogues.htm. Mary was speechless. Thanks, Meg! (Perhaps that thank you could have been better worded...)


MARY'S BIT or FORTUNA SMILES UPON A READER

A very strange story unfolded in April, narration of which will explain the odd header. A gentleman who read One For Sorrow wrote to Poisoned Pen Press and they forwarded his letter to us so we could pass along its request to be put in touch with one of the people listed on OFS' acknowledgement page. This we did. And thus by an almost unbelievable chain of events, two old friends regained contact after losing touch with each other many years before.

And speaking of chains, several folk have asked us if we've seen Gladiator. Alas, thus far we haven't, but in a woo woo coincidence, its director Ridley Scott hails from South Shields, downstream and on the other side of the river from my native Newcastle-on-Tyne.

Perhaps we were fated to become involved with the empire. South Shields boasts the ruins of a Roman fort (Arbeia) dating from the second century and thus more or less contemporary with the villainous Commodus. Meanwhile, most of the Roman Wall (aka Hadrian's Wall) marking that fateful point beyond which there be savages still stands guard across the moorlands beyond Newcastle. Indeed, there's a small and nicely fenced-off chunk of Wall in a western Newcastle cul-de-sac not far from the grammar school I attended. Our school motto was "Nec sorte, nec fato", which we ink-stained second-formers translated as "By neither chance nor fate". (My thanks to freelance Latinist Sally Winchester, who kindly reconstructed my imperfectly recalled Latin). Newcastle was and is a gritty city, but I'm happy to report that the area where I lived lies on the Roman or "civilized" side of the Wall - but only just

As for the "new castle" itself, compared to the Wall it's almost modern. A wooden edifice built in l080, it carried on an honourable tradition of oppressing the locals, for it was erected by Robert Curthose (son of William the Conqueror) on the site of Pons Aelius, yet another Roman fort. The castle was rebuilt in stone in the late ll00s and its keep still stands. I was struck by its really low lintels (literally, for on one occasion I forgot to bend my head as I passed from one room to another), a vivid reminder of how much shorter the average person was in those days. While it would be nice to think that some of Sir Thomas' descendants laboured upon its construction, somehow it seems more likely that they were up to no good, snaffling building supplies when the overseer wasn't looking, or short-changing the gaffer when he purchased ale for the refreshment of workers.


AND FINALLY

Just to refresh your memory, the fourth issue of Orphan Scrivener will come a-tapping at your cyber door on August l5th, a most appropriate date given that it's but two days before the festival of Portunalia. Celebrating Portunes, the old Roman god of harbours, gates and doors, it was customary to throw one's keys into a fire during the festival in order to obtain good fortune..While we can't claim that you'll win the lottery by reading the next issue, we can at least promise no burnt fingers will result from doing so. We'll look forward to seeing you then.

Best wishes Mary and Eric

Saturday, April 15, 2000

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER -- ISSUE # TWO -- l5 APRIL 2000

Here we are darkening your email box again, although this time around the Orphan Scrivener newsletter will perhaps be more letter than news. Never mind, on with the motley and over to

MARY'S BIT or BIRDS OF A FEATHER FORETELL TOGETHER

Cor, guv, our spies tell us that representatives of the raven family are appearing a lot on TV these days.

Ravens were all over the place in an X-Files episode at the beginning of the month. Their mysterious presence permitted Agent Mulder to reveal his knowledge of miscellaneous corvine strangenesses, including their place in Celtic mythology but alas, in so doing, he breathed nary a word on their connection with the prognostic rhyme. But the oddities continued even after the episode's closing woo woo theme music had dissipated into the aether, for on the same network a week or so later, several characters in That 70s Show were less than thrilled to discover that they had just eaten a meal of crows. The cook had apparently mistaken the birds for pheasants - an error it's safe to say John's servant Peter would never make.

But since it's commonly said that events travel in threes, we can only hope Fox TV isn't planning a sweeps week programme depicting the inevitable shambles that occurs When Good Ravens Turn Bad.

Speaking of shambles and general strangenesses, this Orphan Scrivener will flap in at the peak of tax return season. As Benjamin Franklin famously remarked, death and taxes alike are inevitable, and from there it's only a short leap to their link, ie wills. As it happens, not long ago I was reading selections from Corpus Juris Civilis, the great codification of Roman law assembled at Justinian's command. Published over the six years ending in 535 (the year in which One For Sorrow is set) Corpus Juris Civilis is generally acknowledged as the foundation of civil law today, a rather startling thought to say the least but doubtless one which Justinian would find pleasing.

In any event, one section of the Corpus lists classes barred from witnessing wills. Those named include minors, slaves, women, the mentally afflicted and those who cannot hear or speak. Yet under contemporary civil law, a will was legally valid if the person making it recited it in front of seven witnesses - an excellent scenario for a murder mystery if ever I saw one.

NECESSARY EVIL aka THE BSP TICKER

Lately we've developed a distinct resemblance to kippers, having been grilled more than once since the last Orphan Scrivener. Here are a few URLS at which you may care to point your clickers.

At the beginning of April we did our first interview for a UK website. It's to be found at Bookends.

A few weeks before that, the Sixth Grade Think Quest Team fired up the grill in connection with their Millennium Mystery Madness project .

The Team's website includes a history of the mystery, games and an interesting page describing their anatomy of a mystery. You'll also find several authors' comments and advice on writing mysteries. We were honoured to be included among them. Thanks, Think Quest Gumshoes!

The About.com Mystery Guide's April l0th round table discussion of historical mysteries, moderated by Andi Shechter, was more fun than a trunk full of monkeys. Troy Soos and Miriam Grace Monfredo and we two were guests and there's a transcript.

While you're online, you might also like to cast an eye over Susan McBride's column on "The New Golden Age of Mysteries" at the Charlotte Austin Review for some familiar names.

Mt Arlington, NJ, is the location of the Deadly Ink Mystery Conference which will be held from 8.30 am to 4.30 pm on June l7th at the Four Points Sheraton Hotel. Eric will be chatting on one the panels. Announced attendees include Jonathan Harrington, Irene Marcuse and Keith Snyder. Conference organiser Patti Biringer recently revealed that not only will Parnell Hall be giving a luncheon talk entitled "If He Can Do It, Anybody Can", he's also promised to sing!

In other news, we've almost finished writing Two For Joy. Poisoned Pen Press will publish it in October this year (along with the paperback edition of One For Sorrow). Set in 537, Two For Joy opens with more than one mysterious death. John's investigations are hampered by a pagan philosophy tutor from his youth and a heretical Christian prophet whose ultimatums threaten to topple the empire. Then murder strikes close to home and John has only days to find a solution before he, his friends and the city itself are destroyed. Characters include a runaway wife, servants and soldiers, madams and mendicants, a venomous court page and a wealthy landowner or two--not to mention John's bete noire, Empress Theodora.

STOP PRESS

Due to technical problems, our March chat with AOL's Mystery Mavens had to be rescheduled to May. We'll jot a note as soon as we have the date, in case you'd like to stop by and assist in burnishing up our kipperdom.

ERIC'S BIT or SOMETIMES WE DON'T KNOW HOW IT'LL END EITHER

Something that seems to interest people - for we're often asked about it - is how two writers can work together on the same project. Well, when Mary and I write together we start with some characters (say a Greek eunuch and some other secret followers of Mithra who serve the Christian Emperor Justinian) and an idea that strikes us as interesting (what if a traveler from King Arthur's court arrived in Constantinople in search of the Holy Grail?) Then we begin to extrapolate. What should happen first? O.K., so if they see some bull-leapers at the Hippodrome, then what?

But before even approaching the point of coming to blows, we'll have constructed a rough plot outline divided into scenes - no details to speak of, mainly just who does what and when and where. Enough to get started, but not so much as to take the fun out of "discovering" the story as we write it. We might know that John is going to speak to a beggar woman and discover an important clue, but we don't necessarily know exactly what turns their conversation will take. That's the fun of the writing.

So far as individual methods go, Mary thinks and thinks and then whips through a scene before going back to rewrite. I tend to scribble notes and do my rewriting slowly as I go along (which is possible only because of word processors!) At any rate, once we finish the scenes we've chosen to write, we turn them over to our co-writer for "editing", which can be light or heavy.

The further we progress in the outline the more the projected story tends to change. We add, and subtract, scenes and characters, and we might even find out we've initially tabbed the wrong person for the murder!

Our discussions are almost always about ideas, settings, characters, plot twists, clues. Those are what most readers, including myself, read for - not for individual words. I don't much care if a writer hangs an occasional participle so long as I give a hang about the characters. Which is not to say we don't pay any attention to using good grammar and effective words, but that is just the polish. Flaubert was perfectly entitled to his eternal quest for "le mot juste" but if you ask me he's caused aspiring writers a lot of grief!

AND FINALLY

It's a sad coincidence that April l5th l453 was the day the Ottoman Turks captured Constantinople, thus ending the Byzantine Empire - a melancholy thought that also brings this Orphan Scrivener (almost) to its close. The next issue will arrive around the Ides of June, which fall the day before Greeks celebrated the Birthday of the Muses. Musing about jotting us a line? We'll be glad to hear from you!

Otherwise, we'll see you in a couple of months.

Best wishes to all

Mary and Eric
maywrite@epix.net

Our home page and includes personal essays, links to interesting mystery- themed sites, peeks behind the scenes of our fiction, a downloadable interactive game written by Eric and the Orphan Scrivener archive.

Tuesday, February 15, 2000

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER # 1 FEBRUARY 15 2000

Hello!

We understand it is traditional for authors to publish a newsletter to keep anyone who is interested informed about upcoming events, appearances, chats, interviews -- even books. Luckily, both of us have a lot of experience publishing small magazines for friends so we've decided to treat our newsletter rather like a "personalzine," as we used to call them, but with an emphasis on our writing activities. Which is not to say we won't be taking side trips into anything else we might find interesting when we sit down to write each issue.

At the moment we're in the midst of writing the second of our "John the Eunuch" mystery novels, TWO FOR JOY, due out in October from Poisoned Pen Press. Those major publishing houses we approached didn't seem inclined to take a chance on a Byzantine eunuch detective but I'll bet they'd be pleased for any of their authors to have the reviews we've received thus far! So we are dedicating this newsletter to the folks at Poisoned Pen, who rescued John from slush pile Hades.

And now we'll get right down to it.

ERIC'S BIT or PORTRAIT OF INSPECTOR DORJ

During the last week of January a nor'easter took a turn inland and we woke to wind-blown snow shrouding the mountains. I calculated I would have time to retrieve the mail from our post office box and return before the storm intensified, as predicted, around midmorning. I was right but just barely. As I drove home, the car began fish-tailing on a long hill and for a few scary minutes I feared the old Chevette was going to spin out into the path of one of the semis creeping downhill in the opposing lane, ending whatever small chance the aging vehicle still had of reaching classic status, not to mention my dreams of finding out the amount of December's 'phone bill.

Fortunately the mail held something more interesting than the 'phone bill, something which made the trek worthwhile - the March issue of ELLERY QUEEN'S MYSTERY MAGAZINE, containing the third story about our Mongolian Inspector Dorj. "Death on the Trans-Mongolian Railway" is a locked-room mystery set during a wintry train ride, fitting perfectly with the weather that particular day.

A long time ago, I loved to admire my own words on those rare occasions when they made it to publication. Something about the printing process transmutes the base phrases of the typewritten manuscript into gold. But any more, when I see one of our stories in print I avoid rereading it, gripped as I am by an irrational fear that the first sentence will contain a dangling participle, a distinct possibility since I am still not quite clear about what exactly those things are, aside from being the writing equivalent of a large chunk of broccoli stuck between one's front teeth at a social engagement. Even more horrible is the realization that ANY egregious error in the piece is now utterly beyond redemption.

Since EQMM began the practice of illustrating stories, however, I again have something to look forward to on publication, the artist's conception of the character. When our second Dorj story, "The Ladyfish Mystery", came out Mary and I were amazed to find lurking in the background of the illustration none other than Inspector Dorj! Not some badly cast Dorj, you understand (John Wayne as Chinggas Khan?) or even some well-cast Dorj, but Dorj himself, just as we would have described him, had we described him in greater detail.

In Allen Davis' illustration accompanying the latest story Dorj is right up front and just as Dorj-like, leading me to wonder how the artist managed to read our minds from the meager hints given in the text. It's remarkable to see a demonstration of how accurately, apparently, a few words can convey a picture.

Mind you, I am not adamant that readers envision our characters precisely the way I see them. We don't usually give long, detailed physical descriptions. I tend not to assimilate minute details myself, especially regarding fashions about which I don't give that portion of a rat's anatomy that doesn't wear shorts. If anything, too many details can interfere with my preferred vision of the character. While reading Tolkien's wonderful LORD OF THE RINGS trilogy, I had to continually force out of my mind the vision of all that silly hair between the Hobbits' toes. What I like are few nudges. John D. MacDonald's Travis McGee is a former linebacker. That's all I really need to know.

It seems I once read that Erle Stanley Gardener never bothered to describe Perry Mason. Of course he didn't have to because everyone knows Perry Mason looks like Raymond Burr. I suppose a picture, especially a moving picture, will usually trump a verbal description. This might be an argument for detailed descriptions. Not that there needs to be any reason for the mind to leap on visual "clues."

I admit to suffering from dust jacket photo of the author as photo of the character syndrome. Right now I'm reading THE CACTUS CLUB KILLINGS and I just can't help it, Joe Portugal looks like author Nathan Walpow and I wish he would puhleeease, not go wandering around his backyard naked, it's kind of embarrassing.

Of course some authors like being their characters. Mickey Spillane appeared in the movies as Mike Hammer and Kinky Freidman is Kinky Freedman. Although in the latter case, can you really believe anyone actually is Kinky Freidman?

Mary and I don't care for having our photos taken, let alone put on dust jackets, but at least we can't be mistaken for John the Eunuch. Well, I hope not. Mary is the wrong sex and I'm not sure John would sport a full beard like me although he grew some facial hair for his first novel.

In the stories written prior to ONE FOR SORROW, we both thought of John as clean-shaven though I can't recall whether we said so or not. However, the sharp-eyed will have noticed that in the Ravenna mosaic that appears on the cover of ONE FOR SORROW, the man pictured standing at the side of Emperor Justinian, exactly where you'd expect the Lord Chamberlain to be, has a small amount of facial hair.

Now you can't very well ignore contemporary evidence of your character's appearance, can you? So we did get a medical opinion on the matter, and it seems that it is indeed possible that a eunuch such as John, who hadn't suffered from that condition until he was a young man, would be capable of growing facial hair. And that is how the eunuch got it.

There is still the question of who might play John in the movies without doing violence to our amended conception of him. Mary's suggested casting Lance Henriksen, formerly of Millennium, even though he's older than John. As for my preference, heck, if the option was enough to let me spend the rest of my life doing nothing but writing fiction, the studio could even consider Don Knotts or Jean-Claude Van Damme. Now there's an idea. Hollywood's next big action hero - a Byzantine eunuch!


NECESSARY EVIL aka THE BSP TICKER

"A Lock of Hair for Proserpine", the fifth short story concerning John and appropriately enough a locked room mystery set in a replica of the Alexandria lighthouse, appeared late last year in Maxim Jakubowski's second Ellis Peters Memorial anthology, CHRONICLES OF CRIME. Maxim's collection was published in the UK by Headline but no news yet of an American edition.

Our publisher Poisoned Pen Press (http://www.poisonedpenpress.com) has announced that the paperback edition of ONE FOR SORROW will appear this October, coinciding with publication of John's next novel length adventure,

TWO FOR JOY. An extract from "Death on the Trans-Mongolian Railway" has just been put up on EQMM's website (http://www.mysterypages.com/reedexec.html) complete with a smaller version of its illustration.

Riddle: What has one keyboard, four hands and thirteen fingers?

Answer: The two of us during our first ever chat at The Mystery Place at Talk City.

We'll be doing another chat with the Mystery Mavens at Oprah's Online Book Cafe on AOL. Our appointment in cyberspace is March 8th. Do drop by if you can. We're a bit more experienced now, but Eric still uses three fingers to type.


MARY'S BIT or PLEASE DO NOT SEND ELEPHANTS

Imagine, if you will (shades of Rocky Horror) the Innocent Scrivener sitting in the basement, steaming mug of coffee in hand, mulling over the next bit of golden prose, when...

... without so much as a by-your-leave or a warning creak, the light fixture falls off the ceiling, swinging in a graceful Pit-amd-Pendulum arc bringing it less than a foot away from Innocent Scrivener's arm in a budget recreation of the famous chandelier scene in "Phantom of the Opera". With liberal amounts of coffee distributed around the domestic scenery, of course.

The light fixture in question is trough-shaped and sports two "light sabre" type bulbs. Fortunately neither exploded. But there it was, swinging gently in the draught from Scrivener’s surprised shrieks, as visions of the entire ceiling coming down began to dance through assorted heads. Swift remedial action was needed. So while one party held the thing up at arm's length out of harm's way, another raced off for the stepladder. Soon the rogue light was precariously propped up on a stack of reference books pile precariously on the stop step of the ladder, thus keeping its not inconsiderable weight off its wiring and terminating its graceful meanderings.

Upon closer examination, the reason the light had fallen was discovered. The thick wooden board to which it was attached had been fixed to the ceiling material, not an actual beam. Much sage nodding of heads and agreement that it was amazing that it stayed up there as long as it had. A handy relative spent an hour or two re-installing the light but unfortunately the necessary measuring and drilling and hammering upset the cat, whose conniption at the rapid descent of the light had caused it to take cover under the sideboard. After a noisy few moments, it took itself off upstairs in a huff, arriving at the upper floor just as the dinner guests arrived. With their young and rather excitable Pomeranian. So the cat fled back downstairs and hid somewhere in the false ceiling, to emerge some hours later looking very disgruntled and not a little dusty.

Not surprisingly after all the excitement, dinner was served a little late, but at least it was available to be eaten, since luckily it was not until the following day that the water supply was lost for several hours. But we could see quite well to look for it, as by then the light fixture was firmly back in place with several extra screws attaching it to the beam for additional security. In fact, said its re-installer, it was now so well attached that we could hang an elephant from it without it falling down again.

But please don't send us elephants to test his hypothesis. The shock might be too much for the cat.


AND FINALLY

As newsletters go, this one hasn't got much beyond the end of the street, which isn’t surprising as we're still in the process of deciding which direction to take when we arrive at the road junction up there. So if you'd like to send a suggestion or two on the sort of topic you’d like to see addressed or perhaps a question about writing or our favourite colours or whatever, please do jot a line and we'll be happy to respond both by email and in the next issue.

Meantime, you might like to glance over our home page, which offers personal essays, links to interesting mystery themed sites, peeks behind the scenes of our fiction and a downloadable interactive game by Eric, among other things. Plus there are links to recent reviews and interviews online, including January Magazine, About.com's Mystery Guide, Talk City, Charlotte Austin Review, Murder On The Internet Express and Fiat Girl. And who knows what all else may have been popped in there by the time this newsletter darkens your email box? You can find out by pointing your clicker at http://home.epix.net/~maywrite.

We'll be back in your email box around the Ides of every second month. Of course if we're going to be on Oprah or something you'll receive a Special Edition! We're a little late with this first issue since the Ides of February is the 13th. Today is Lupercalia, an old Roman holiday of which the Christian Emperor Justinian would not approve although some of the pagans in our books would probably find it to their liking. Among other things, celebrants smeared with goats' blood raced around the Palantine Hill in Rome. Anyway, we'll see you again around the middle of April, a time traditionally celebrated by financial bloodletting here in the USA.

Best wishes to all

Mary and Eric <

The Orphan Scrivener -- Issue # One Hundred and Sixty -- 15 August 2026

While in north Africa years ago, a member of the family demonstrated it is indeed possible to fry an egg on a vehicle bonnet although wheth...