Friday, April 15, 2005

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER -- ISSUE # THIRTY-TWO -- l5 APRIL 2005

Spring is finally stirring as these lines are written, although we've yet to catch so much as a glimpse of Wordsworth's harbinger of the season, the pensive but venturesome snowdrop. Nor have we heard that other herald of the departure of winter, to wit, the honks of approaching geese winging it back from their southern sojourn.

Even so, we propose that, since US tax returns are due today, l5th April be renamed Goosedown Day given Jean Baptiste Colbert was of the opinion tax authorities should pluck the goose in such a way as to obtain the most feathers with the least hissing. Then too, given the nature of this annual penance, many taxpayers must feel akin to the unfortunate bird depicted on signs announcing public houses named the Goose and Gridiron.

Even if you don't care for the proposal, since Orphan Scrivener is a lot less taxing to read than the Form l040 instructions, now you've got this far you might as well take a gander at the rest of it. So read on, and hopefully this issue won't ruffle your feathers too much!


ERIC'S BIT or SALARY AND EGG SANDWICH

Yesterday I ate an egg salad sandwich and as I bit through the soft bread and crunched into the chopped celery in the egg and mayonnaise, I was transported back to a county law library in New Jersey. I worked there for 48 weeks and shortly after noon each day I sat at my desk and ate an egg salad sandwich. The first day on the job I ordered one from the cafeteria menu, and the second day as well. By the third day the lady at the counter seemed so pleased at being able to guess what I wanted the moment I came into view that I never thereafter had the heart to disappoint her.

As a kid I loved the library. I'd cart home tall stacks of picture books in the morning and return for a second stack in the afternoon. But I'd never considered being a librarian until rising tuition costs forced me to finish law school by going to night classes and finding a day job. The law library was not exactly like my home town library, although the endless rows of brown West reporters and the stolid jurisprudences contained things just as wacky as any Dr. Seus books, albeit they seemed to be from the Grinch's point of view. This particular law library was traditionally in the hands of a third year law student. It was suitable employment since it consisted mostly of sitting at the front desk, on call, studying.

I was the chief librarian and my staff consisted of myself. It had been made plain that the whole population of the county prison next door to the courthouse was at my beck and call should I need assistance in rearranging books or what-not but I was never keen to take advantage.

Because the library was only open to lawyers and district court judges (which is to say the clerks the judges sent to the library to fetch what they needed and do their research) I rarely had to explain to anyone how to use a publication and only occasionally had to locate one. My main duties were to make sure books were signed out, replace the toner in the photocopy machine, water the purple-leafed plant which served as the library mascot, refuse to purchase anything from the legal publishers' salesmen who called regularly, and avoid paying bills for materials which had already been obtained.

Although I was under orders to never purchase anything from the salesmen who showed up every week I was, from time to time, allowed to order an extra copy of a New Jersey reporter for a judge who had had one of his decisions reprinted. Even judges like to see their by-line. The only time I ever heard from the judges was around the turn of the year when a number of them called to make sure the salesmen had delivered the free legal calendars/planners on schedule.

Sometimes I fantasized about locking myself inside the library, putting the law beyond the reach of judges and lawyers, bringing the courts to a screeching halt. What I did was water my plant, and study, and put toner in the photocopy machine.

Once I did some legal research for a fellow my own age who was running for his late father's school board seat. He was fending off an attempt to move his name (familiar to the voters) from the first column on the ballot to the second. We won the case on the basis that he was already, irreparably, out of pocket $24 for campaign handouts showing the original ballot -- and he was duly elected.

When my time at the library was up, I became a legal editor instead of a lawyer. I took with me a cutting from the purple-leafed plant. Years later I would sit in my office at lunch time and contemplate my own purple-leafed plant while eating the sandwich I'd packed, usually Spam on toast. I avoided egg salad. It is only recently I have begun to eat egg salad again.

As for my purple-leafed plant, when I left the company I took it with me. Despite good care, it eventually died and thus was cut the last link on that particular chain.


NECESSARY EVIL or THE BSP TICKER

The ticker was deathly quiet until two days before this issue was to be released upon an unsuspecting world. Then came a slew of news, so here's the skinny:

SUMMING UP or FOUR AND SIX MAKE THREE

Editions, that is.

Poisoned Pen Press will issue their trade paperback edition of Four For A Boy on lst November 2005. To refresh your memory, Fourfer is the prequel to John's adventures and relates not only how he came to set his boots on the ladder to his current high office, but also (among other things) how he first met poet about town Anatolius, the Egyptian madam Isis, and Felix, then a rank and file excubitor.

The same date sees publication of Six For Gold in hardback as well as in a large type trade paperback edition for the visually impaired. Sixfer relates John's adventures in Egypt, whence Justinian inexplicably sends him to discover why sheep in a remote village are cutting their own throats -- and this at the very time John desperately needs to clear himself of accusations he murdered a senator in the Hippodrome.

Mehenopolis, a pilgrim destination thanks to its ancient shrine to a snake deity as well as the home of the late sheep, is nearly as Byzantine in its ways and undercurrents as Constantinople. Among suspicious characters John encounters are a pretentious local landowner battling a self-styled magician for control of the lucrative shrine, an exiled heretical cleric, an itinerant bee-keeper, and a disgraced charioteer. Meanwhile, in Constantinople, John's friend Anatolius does his best to trace the senator's murderer. At stake are not only John's honor and his head, but also the family with whom he recently reunited, now in danger of being broken apart -- or worse.


MARY'S BIT or GRINDING OUT A LIVING

Perusing the colourless list of occupational codes in the 1040 instruction booklet, my attention began to wander and I started to think about jobs that were once common street sights.

Where now, I pondered, might be seen cats-meat men, organ grinders, jugglers and dancers, roving silhouette cutters or menders of umbrellas? Faded into history or at least gone indoors to ply their skill, it seems, along with most of their fellow open air tradesmen -- strolling sellers of bird cages, violets, pin cushions, broadsheets and stationery, matches, toys, and brooms, not to mention all manner of household necessaries ranging from rat poison, cigars, dolls, tea trays, ornaments and trinket boxes to combs, pipes, griddles, bootlaces, buttons, sponges, penknives, and crockery.

Peripatetic purveyors of packets of pornography containing only cut-up sheets of old newspaper -- secure in the knowledge few cheated customers would dare complain to the authorities -- no longer lurk in dark corners with a wink and a nod and a leer, having to a large degree moved online. Sweepers of crossings, pickers-over of ashes and dust heaps, and collectors of bones and offal are gone, and so are most of the mudlarks who scratched out a living from whatever they uncovered along river margins, including what remained in the pockets of the dead washed ashore. These and similar dangerous and dirty occupations have been largely taken over, if not actually destroyed, by intervention of local sanitary and public works departments.

Yet on reflection it occurred to me that a fair number of these old trades do in fact persist, albeit in modified forms. The busker loudly works a cinema queue or moves out of the rain to play in an Underground station corridor. One man bands are not completely unknown, and a friend reported seeing a girl dancing for money on a London street. Like those shifty customers who smilingly invite the unwary to spot the dried pea hidden under a particular thimble, sharp salesmen (often offering faux name brand watches as their stock in trade, another scam that is popular on the Web) linger on kerbs beside cunningly constructed suitcases-on-folding-legs, one eye alert for approaching constables and the other sizing up passersby for possible marks.

Outdoor byways everywhere host sellers of food and drink ranging from soup to nuts -- my favourite is a mobile fish and chip shop trading from a converted ice cream van, though I would not want to be aboard when taking sharp corners at a fair clip with a vat of boiling oil bubbling in the back. And of course there are hundreds of open air markets selling fruit, vegetables, antiques, old clothes, silverware, linen, china, flowers, and just about all of the commodities once hawked through the streets by footsore vendors. Even yet, the occasional rag and bone collector or sandwich man can be spied crossing the far distance, while a few Punch and Judy men continue squawking and dealing out puppet mayhem at seaside resorts and the occasional village fair.

It was a time ago, but a knife and scissor sharpener carting along his foot-driven grindstone occasionally passed down our street. However, before we obtained a steel poker-like cutlery sharpener my father always honed our carving knife on the back step so the unfortunate grinder got no custom from the Reed household. Bike-riding and beret-sporting onion sellers festooned with strings of their pungent wares are a familiar sight to this day. On the other hand, while it's been years since I heard a tinker shouting willingness to mend pots and pans as he drove his horse and cart past, there are still gypsy ladies who tap at the door now and then, selling hand-made clothes pegs or offering bunches of white heather for good luck.

If the last mentioned entrepreneurs were common in the US they'd do a fair trade in the white heather business at this time of year, seeing as large numbers of folk are about to peg out from exhaustion after wading through the dense prose of the tax booklets and then finding out, only a day or so before the l5th -- as happened to us this year -- that the IRS had omitted to send all the needed forms.


AND FINALLY

Talking about occupations brings to mind that in the last issue of Orphan Scrivener Eric set out our reasoning for presenting Cornelia and her daughter Europa as performing in recreations of the ancient art of bull leaping. We have just heard from Catfish Guru author Mark Terry that less than a fortnight after that newsletter appeared, USA Today ran a series about the ten worst jobs in sports. It included a piece about bullfighters (as rodeo clowns are now called) in which an interviewee said that occasionally bullfighters jump over the bull as part of their fun. http://www.usatoday.com/sports/tenworstjobs-3-bullfighter.htm

We rests our case, m'lud.

Friedrich Nietzsche characterised postmen as intermediaries for impolite surprises -- apparently he considered letters as unannounced visits. While we wouldn't wish to leap to hasty conclusions, this statement perhaps reveals more about the nature of his correspondence than he realised, but since it's not our intent to impolitely jump into your email in-box without due warning, let it be known the next Orphan Scrivener will be transmitted into the aether on l5th June. See you then!

Best wishes
Mary R and Eric

who invite you to visit their home page, hanging out on the virtual washing line at http://home.epix.net/~maywrite/ There you'll find the usual suspects, including more personal essays, a list of author freebies, Doom Cat (an interactive game written by Eric), and a jigsaw featuring the handsome cover of Five For Silver. There's also an Orphan Scrivener archive so don't say you weren't warned! Intrepid subscribers may also wish to pop over to visit Eric's blog at http://www.journalscape.com/ericmayer/


Tuesday, February 15, 2005

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER -- ISSUE # THIRTY-ONE -- l5 FEBRUARY 2005

On a cold February day we arrive at your in-box with this latest issue, which marks five full years of publication of Orphan Scrivener.

According to that strange song Green Grow The Rushes, Oh, five represents the symbols at your door while V, the Latin numeral five, has been characterised as a hook. This being so, our hook to drag you further into this newsletter is to advise you to forget about the rivals, gospel-makers, and lily white boys that memorably throng the song. Instead, do continue reading and in return we promise not to be too noisy, just in case the symbols on your threshold are, as some claim, cymbals.


MARY'S BIT or ANOTHER SORT OF GOOD CHARACTER

The sense of an era is sometimes conveyed in subtle ways. Glancing over Herbert Fry's Royal Guide to the London Charities (l9l7) when researching for a project recently, I noticed many charities were founded in Victorian times and thus indirectly provide a snapshot of the work London society at least felt was important enough to support.

Needless to say, there were numerous benevolent societies providing financial and other aid to workers in various trades, as well as dispensaries, convalescent homes, and hospitals treating the poor. Organisations to benefit children offered food, clothing, medical aid and housing, and educated and trained them for various trades as well as assisting some to voluntarily emigrate to the far reaches of the empire. Care was provided for stray cats and dogs, while the Home of Rest for Horses (l886) recalls the huge number of working equines in the city. There were homes for the inebriated and help was available for discharged prisoners of both sexes.

As one might expect, several societies assisted fallen women. The object of the Battersea Mission House (l880) was saving "young women in perilous circumstances, and to receive the fallen, especially first maternity cases", while the London Female Guardian Society (l807) provided "an asylum for the rescue, reclamation, and protection of betrayed and fallen women".

There are hints of class consideration even among those helping these unfortunate. The Anchorage Mission of Hope and Help (l878) noted they assisted penitent young women, but added "Especial provision for better class cases". Single women who entered St Mary Magdalene's Home (l865) received shelter for a year after the birth of their first child, but were considered only "if previously of good character."

Those from the better class who fell on hard times could also apply for relief to the Distressed Gentlefolks' Aid Association (l897). The Royal United Kingdom Beneficent Association (l863) provided annuities to persons from the upper and middle class in reduced circumstances, provided they were over 40, sound of mind, and unable to earn a living due to bodily infirmities.

Religious and missionary organisations naturally abounded, working both at home and abroad. For example, while the Hoxton Coster's Mission (l86l) evangelized and helped street-traders and slum dwellers -- I do wonder why they would mention donkey shows as part of their work -- the Baptist Missionary Society (l792) did not hesitate to take a global view, for their stated intent was "To diffuse Christianity throughout the world".

Some charitable institutions listed exist to this day, such as the Anti-Vivisection Society, St John Ambulance Association, YMCA and YWCA, and the Royal National Lifeboat Institution. Others are very much of their time -- the Anti-Slavery and Aborigines Protection Society (l837) which looked after "interests of native races, especially in countries under British rule" or the Irish Distressed Ladies' Fund (l887) for relieving ladies who, because of changes in Irish landed properties, had no income and had been reduced to poverty.

And finally, one charity that must surely resonate with subscribers is the Royal Literary Fund, founded in l790 and incorporated in l8l8. Its aim was to assist "authors of published works of approved literary merit, and authors of important contributions to periodical literature, who may be in want or distress, their widows, orphans, mothers, or sisters."

While this is an enterprise readers and writers alike will applaud, doubtless subscribers have noticed immediately the authors' fathers apparently had to shift for themselves, not to mention that the prospectus description strongly suggests authors were always male. Perhaps I should look into the Royal Literary Fund and if they are still in existence apply for a grant, just for the heck of it.


NECESSARY EVIL or THE BSP TICKER

In keeping with this fifth anniversary edition, we have a quintet of news items this time around, so dive right in!

FIVEFER RESURFACES or ALEXANDER, A GREAT AWARD

Speaking of fives, Five For Silver has been nominated for the Bruce Alexander Historical Mystery Award for the best 2004 historical mystery, the winning book to be announced at Left Coast Crime at the end of the month.

Appropriately, a total of five Poisoned Pen authors have been nominated for awards to be announced at LCC. The other three PPP nominees for works published in 2004 are Ruth Dudley Edwards for the Lefty Award (most humorous mystery) for Carnage on the Committee, fellow historical mystery author Priscilla Royal was also nominated for the Bruce Alexander Award for Tyrant of the Mind, and Twist Phelan is nominated for the Calavera Award (best mystery set in the geographical area covered by Left Coast Crime) for Family Claims.

FIVEFER AGAIN or COVERING ALL THE FACES

Readers fond of a different sort of puzzle might enjoy the new jigsaw on our website. It features the subtle grey cover of Five For Silver. Point your clicker to http://home.epix.net/~maywrite/jig.htm

FUN AND GAMES OUR WEBSITE or THE TICKING KITTY

Your cat is ticking! Hurry! Do something! Eric has written Doom Cat, a very short interactive game you can play online at http://home.epix.net/~maywrite/doom.htm

Speaking of which, Eric's interactive fiction game WAX WORX was voted winner in the Most unusual Adrift setting/plot category of the 2004 InsideAdrift Awards. It also finished second in the game of the year category. If you'd like to try it, check out http://baf.wurb.com/if/game/2352

HERODOTUS RETURNS or AN HISTORICAL ORACLE

We're pleased to announce that The Oracle of Amun, our second short story featuring Herodotus as sleuth, will appear in Mike Ashley's new anthology The Mammoth Book of Historical Whodunnits: Third Collection. This time around our companion scriveners include Ed Hoch, Peter Tremayne, Sharan Newman, Margaret Frazer, Edward Marston, Lynda S. Robinson, and Ian Rankin. It will be published in July by Constable-Robinson in the UK with an American edition from Carroll & Graf -- we'll pass along the date of publication for the latter in due course.

MORE MAYER MUSINGS or BLOGS AHOY

Eric's now running a blog. Entries deal with topics all over the landscape, so subscribers may like to sample a page or two at http://www.journalscape.com/ericmayer/

ERIC'S BIT or DON'T LEAP TO THE WRONG CONCLUSION

I recently came across an article of interest in the online sf magazine, Strange Horizons. In Bull-Leaping in Bronze Age Crete http://www.strangehorizons.com/2005/20050124/bull-leaping-a.shtml Marie Brennan details what is known, and not known, about the ancient sport. What was the purpose of bull-leaping? Who engaged in it? What evidence survives?

The question that interested me most was whether it is possible to face down a charging bull, grab its horns, and somersault up onto the creature's back, which is the popular conception, not surprisingly since it’s what surviving images seem to show. Expert opinion is mixed, but leans strongly toward "no way!"

This piqued my curiosity because in our mystery novels John’s daughter, Europa, and her mother, Cornelia, are bull-leapers. To be precise, 6th century Cretans who recreate the even then ancient sport for the entertainment of Byzantine era audiences.

Mary and I never worried much about bull-leaping technique, except insofar as we didn't want to get it wrong. (Ah...now there's trouble brewing I've brought Mary into it, notice...) We figured we'd be safe if we had our bull leapers recreate what they would have been able to see in the same frescoes that shape our own picture of the practice. If historians suddenly proved that people today have been misinterpreting those images, well, our characters made the same mistake! And what’s more, the Byzantine audience would expect to see bull-leapers doing what those old frescoes showed them doing and not what some professor, 1,500 years in the future, was going to decide they’d been doing.

Sheer, physical impossibly was another matter. It is pretty hard to justify characters doing the impossible, even if it has been considered possible for thousands of years. As a writer interested in historical accuracy my first thought was, naturally, oh no! I hope we never showed them leaping? Did we ever show them leaping?

Unfortunately, yes. In the very first chapter of the very first book. But how detailed had we been? What did we say? Maybe we were vague. Let’s hope we were vague. I couldn't remember, so I looked and found:

"The bull bellowed. Suddenly it was in motion, hooves hammering the ground.

"The girl stood her ground as the animal closed in.

"At the last instant the bull lowered its head, its gilded horns flashing murderous intent in the sunlight. For a moment John's eyes blurred. He blinked rapidly, and when he focused on the girl again she had left the earth as easily as a sparrow, vaulting over the onrushing animal's head, grabbing its deadly horns to land lightly on its back."

Ouch! Could we have got that wrong?

Well, let's not be too hasty! Whatever the weight of opinion might be, some authorities still take the images literally. (Please don’t ask whether they’re living...) Mary and I are always open to learned opinions which coincide with our dramatic impulses.

Moreover, there are some who postulate that the bulls were specially trained. One of the main arguments of the bull-leaping spoilsports is that it would be impossible to grab the horns of a charging bull because the bull sweeps its horns back and forth in a goring motion.

Notice that our magnificently trained taurine performer only lowers his head. His horns merely flash. Nothing is said about them sweeping. No, they are right there for the grabbing -- and what's more, although the bull is in "motion" there is no indication that this motion is rapid. John is able to blink a few times while the girl executes her maneuver. In fact, it is quite possible he does not actually see her grab the horns, but only has the impression she did so. She may just have leapt over the bull's purposefully lowered head.

Phew! That was a close call. Luckily writers of historicals always think of everything....


AND FINALLY

As Simon and Garfunkel memorably sang years ago, April *will* come, but unfortunately for US subscribers at least April l5th will be a two-aspirin date since it's not only Tax Return Day, but will also bring the next issue of Orphan Scrivener. See you then!

Best wishes
Mary R and Eric

who invite you to visit their home page, hanging out on the virtual washing line that is the aether at:
http://home.epix.net/~maywrite/
Therein you'll find the usual suspects, including more personal essays and a list of author freebies as well as the features mentioned above. For those new to the subscription list there's also the Orphan Scrivener archive, so don't say you weren't warned!

Wednesday, December 15, 2004

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER -- ISSUE # THIRTY -- l5 DECEMBER 2004

This is a bleak time of year, even though the coldest part of the winter has yet to come down the pike. Yet despite our being in the middle of Keats' drear-nighted December, the shortest day is within sight so it won't be long before the nights will begin to draw out again until all too soon we'll be complaining about the heat.

In the meantime, while Tennyson's exhortation for the wild bells to ring out to the wild sky referred to the peals that traditionally ring in each new year, we ought to point out any tintinnabulation smiting the ear hereabouts is more likely to be Poe's brazen alarum bells screaming out their affright at our announcement that this final 2004 issue of Orphan Scrivener is now formally declared open. Read on!


ERIC'S BIT or THE SQUARE ON THE HIPPODROME

I've written before about accuracy in historical fiction but it is a subject worth revisiting. Mary and I do our best to stick to reality when we write about the past. Perhaps because we both started as fans of sf and fantasy we are sensitive to the differences between those genres and historicals. However, the nature of history allows plenty of scope for creativity.

One interesting thing we have discovered in researching our novels is that what scholars "know" is as often as not a matter of intense dispute amongst scholars themselves and varies wildly from one individual to the next. Further, our "knowledge" of the past is often based on far less evidence than a casual reader of history books would imagine. For example, even today scholars cannot agree on the exact location of many landmarks in ancient Constantinople, small as the area is. Further, the past has a peculiar habit of changing right along with the present, with current thought, new generations of historians looking to make their mark, fresh discoveries, intellectual fads, and academic movements. Whatever the past really was, the past we know is in constant flux. However one scholar might describe the past, we can be assured that some other reputable scholar differs, or is busily writing a treatise which will differ. However we understand things to have been, looking back from our current vantage point, fifty years hence those looking back will see something different.

As writers of historical mysteries Mary and I are, first and foremost, trying to tell a good story. We aren't historians nor do we pretend to be. I'm not aware that historians present original research in the form of novels. Clearly, if you want pure history you read pure history. However, since we write historical mysteries and not fantasies, we try to get our facts right. We can't describe the Hippodrome as being square because the oblong ruins are still there to see. It's a fact. On the other hand, we have some leeway in describing the environs of the Great Palace since little of it remains and scholars are not sure what it looked like. Various opinions have been presented, but they are not facts even though some scholars tend to present their opinions as facts.

Thus, Mary and I ask whether something "could happen." In asking ourselves whether something "could happen" we don't mean could it happen in an alternate history where all the conditions exist to make it possible. For example, we wouldn't write a historical mystery in which Leonardo da Vinci built a workable flying machine. Da Vinci thought up a lot of amazing inventions when he wasn't busy writing codes but the technology of the time probably wouldn't have been adequate to create them even if the general theories were correct. In the world he lived in, he probably couldn't have built a workable flying machine.

In deciding whether we can include something in a novel we first ask whether the matter at hand is fact or opinion. If it is fact the matter is settled -- but as it turns out a lot of historical facts are really opinions. When we are faced with an opinion we then look to see whether there is some reputable modern academic support. As mentioned, in many cases there are conflicting views. If the view which aids our story appears to have some reasonable support among scholars we feel free to go with it, even though some may disagree. The opinion or viewpoint of an individual scholar is not a fact. For example, many Byzantists insist that in an important work Cyril Mango got the location of the entrance to the Great Palace entirely wrong, and Mango is one of the greatest authorities on Byzantium.

Fiction -- even modern fiction -- is, after all, about things that haven't happened. All the world-threatening plots one reads about in modern thrillers haven't happened. But they could happen. Maybe. I'd bet that modern thriller writers stretch the fabric of reality further than the most careless writers of historicals when the former imagine what might be possible. So, although Mary and I want to stick to what "could happen" in our historical era we don't feel we have to constrain our creativity either to the point of only using ideas that can be absolutely verified or that historians all agree upon. (If something absolutely could not have happened than we obviously can't use it nor can we use something that verifiably didn't happen.)

Here's an example. In Two For Joy, Philo, John's former philosophy tutor who has spent a few years in Persia, brings a chess game back to Constantinople. It was called Shatranj at the time. Chess was not mentioned as appearing in Byzantium for several decades. However, it existed already in the east. We saw no reason why we couldn't postulate that a traveler to the east had brought a chess game back, before its presence was mentioned in the surviving literature. Perhaps no writer remarked on this isolated chess game, the only one in the city. Perhaps one did but the manuscript was lost, along with the vast majority of classical writings, in the intervening centuries. This is the sort of thing we are talking about when we ask could it have happened. Could certain things have happened during the historical period as we think we know it? Not whether history could've turned out differently.


NECESSARY EVIL or THE BSP TICKER

There's only a couple of items on the ticker this time, so it'll be a fast read!

JOHN IN KANSAS or FIVE GOES FORTH

We were honoured to learn recently that Five For Silver has been chosen for transmission by the Kansas Audio-Reader Network, based at the University of Kansas in Lawrence. It will air December l7-29 at l0 pm central time.

Broadcasts are intended primarily (although not exclusively) for people who find reading standard print difficult because of a visual or physical disability. Interested parties can access the printed word in various ways (including Internet broadcasts), details of which can be found on the KARN website at:

http://reader.ku.edu

To find Audio Information Services in other parts of the country point your clicker at the International Association of Audio Information Services at:

http:///iaais.org or call them at l-800-280-5325.

HIST, A LIST or FOUR FOR THE HONOUR

Our thanks to Kim Malo, webmistress for the Crime Through Time website (http://www.crimethrutime.com) and frequent contributor to its related discussion list (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CrimeThruTime), who was kind enough to list Four For A Boy when discussing her Best Historical Mysteries of 2004. We particularly appreciate the honour since Kim stated she does not normally care much for prequels 8-}

YET MORE GOOD NEWS or FIVE FOR THE KUDOS AT YOUR DOOR

Another of our scrivenings was similarly Taken Notice Of when Rachel Hyde, reviewer for the Crime Thru Time website (her page can be viewed at http://www.crimethrutime.com/rachels/reviews) also included one of John's adventures, this year"s Five For Silver, in her list of Best Historical Mysteries of 2004. On John's behalf as well as our own, our thanks to Rachel!

MARY'S BIT or WHAT A CARRY ON

I find the unlikely strands sometimes connecting A to B on the Web a constant source of surprise and delight, and never more so than recently when, looking up Something Entirely Different, I learnt that Robert Bruce Montgomery, who as Edmund Crispin was the author of The Moving Toyshop, a favourite mystery, also wrote music for several of the classic Carry On comedies.

Upon reading this, the original crew of Carry On thespians immediately arose in the mind's eye -- walnut-faced Sid James with his fruity laugh, dimple-chinned and jolly Joan Sims, buxom Hattie Jaques with her sweet smile, outrageously camp and nostril-flarer Kenneth Williams, impishly grinning Charles Hawtrey, he of the round-framed spectacles and absentminded air, and bubbly Barbara Windsor, her tottering blond hairdo nigh as tall as herself.

Over thirty Carry Ons have appeared, although twenty years after the series began -- say around the mid-l970s or so -- they began to star fewer of the original crew for one reason or another. In some cases death had taken them forever offstage. Between those losses and shifts in what was and is considered comical, these later entries are generally regarded as not up to scratch, but in earlier times the series was much loved in the UK and not surprisingly placed consistently among the top-grossing productions at kinematic palace box offices.

What was it about the always less than politically correct Carry On films that appealed so much to British filmgoers? It's hard to put a finger on it exactly (a perfectly innocent phrase which would have leapt upon and made much of in any of these films). I believe it was largely due to the fact they carried on several fine old British traditions not entirely unconnected with music hall -- smuttiness that somehow didn't offend and a healthy amount of honest vulgarity along with huge helpings of robust sexual innuendo of the naughty seaside postcard variety, the resulting mix well laced with occasional glimpses of as much female pulchritude as the censors would allow. Plots were paper thin, serving merely to set the scene and then launch a seemingly endless stream of groanworthy puns, double entendres, naughty jokes, outrageous situations, racy comments, and sight gags, held together by character types that changed little from film to film.

Character names contributed to the fun inasmuch as they were so inevitable that, like familiar family jokes, they raised a laugh no matter how obvious they were. A few examples: Senna, wife of Hengis Pod (Carry On, Cleo), Albert Poop-Decker (Carry On, Jack), the Khasi of Kalabar and Bungit Din (Carry On Up The Khyber), Sid Plummer and W. C. Boggs (Carry On At Your Convenience), the Duc De Pommfrit and Citizen Camembert (Carry On Don't Lose Your Head), caddish Sir Roger de Lodgerly (Carry On Henry), and Doctors Stoppidge, Nookey, and Carver (Carry On Again Doctor). One of the most memorable was Charles Hawtrey's character in Carry On Up The Khyber, which reappeared in a recent biography of the actor bearing the proud subtitle of The Man Who Was Private Widdle.

Another likely reason for the success of the Carry On films was the affectionate but pointed fun they poked at British institutions. Carry On Sergeant, the team's first film in l958, dealt with National Service, a two year conscription period that British men aged l8 and upwards were required to serve at the time. The plot concerns a particularly hopeless bunch of new recruits who form the last squad Sergeant Grimshawe will train before he retires, and one which he bets a colleague he will knock into such good shape that it will be voted the Star Squad of that year's intake. Audience members familiar with square-bashing, potato peeling, bayonet practice, and being marched on the double everywhere by stentorian-voiced sergeant majors doubtless enjoyed seeing the system mercilessly sent up as well as its depiction of the camaraderie that such service inspired.

Such was the success of the film that the team went forth again. Its next outing was Carry on Nurse, the first of an eventual quartet poking fun at the familiar National Health Service (the other three were Carry On Doctor, Carry On Again Doctor, and Carry On Matron). Needless to say, all featured gags about bedpans, painful injections in the rear, hospital food, haughty specialists, and bolshie patients. These medical shenanigans introduced Hattie Jacques' signature role as a dragon of a matron, striking fear into doctors, nurses, patients, and hospital support staff alike.

Needless to say, other kinematic productions were not safe from the script writers, and more than one had the mickey mercilessly taken out of it. Carry on Cleo utilised the same sets and some of the props and costumes from the Burton-Taylor epic -- even its poster had a rather familiar look to it. This was the Roman epic containing the much-quoted line from Kenneth Williams, whose just-stabbed Caesar cries out "Infamy, infamy, you've all got it infamy". Carry on Jack made fun of the great British seafaring tradition as well as Hornblowerian sagas and featured an anything-but fearless Captain Fearless and a mutinous crew, while Carry on Screaming parodied Hammer's successful run of horror films, complete with a dark, cobwebby house inhabited by a sinister scientist and his sister whose doings are investigated by a Victorian policeman and his medical sidekick in an attempt to find out why young local women are disappearing.

British culture took its lumps as well. Carry on Camping had fun with the era's popularity of those sylvan breaks under canvas, while Carry On Abroad satirised the increasing number of Britons taking foreign package holidays, only to find unfinished hotels as the destination to which they all unknowingly flocked, in this instance in the Spanish holiday town of Elsbels.

In due course, certain periods in history became targets. The French Revolution and the Scarlet Pimpernel both provided grist for the mill with Carry On, Don't Lose Your Head (perhaps one of the weaker entries in the series) while Carry On Up the Kyhber dealt with the waning days of the British Empire when tribes were waiting to pour down the pass in order to get up to no good, especially once they found out what the much-feared Scottish regiment really wore under its kilts. It was in this film that Joan Sims as Lady Ruff-Diamond observed in true stiff upper lip fashion "I seem to be getting a little plastered" as the ceiling fell down around a dinner party being held during the bombardment of the British Embassy. In Carry On Henry Sid James played a bawdy Henry VIII trying his lusty best to beget an heir with Marie of France, a wife previously unknown to history. She unfortunately liked to eat garlic and refused to stop, thus leading to a royal demand she be removed one way or another without causing offence to her cousin, the French king. Then there was Carry on Dick, which dealt not with private eyes as one might expect but rather folk hero and highwayman Dick Turpin, with jokes that no doubt can be imagined.

While recent resurgence of interest in sword and sandal epics has led to occasional interesting if ultimately fruitless contemplation here at Casa Maywrite as to what sort of shambles the Carry On crew would have made of John's adventures, I must admit to surprise that they never got around to skewering Shakespeare and his times. Think of the wonderful material they'd provide -- an era of robust manners and morals, plays featuring women disguised as men and mistaken identities, a roistering society cursed with primitive sanitation, and endless courtly intrigues -- plus the golden opportunity to title a Carry On film in their traditional slyly suggestive manner, which is to say by using the common diminutive of Shakespeare's Christian name.


AND FINALLY

Speaking of Shakespeare brings to mind those doleful lines in Cymbeline, whereby Arviragus asks his companions what they'll have to talk about during the freezing hours of windy, rainy Decembers when they were old. Ever helpful, had we been within hailing (or even sleeting) distance of that Welsh cave, we'd have suggested a brisk round or two of last issue's Name That Emporium Challenge. Which leads us nicely to subscriber RG, who contributes not only a set of business appellations but also provides an appropriate slogan or three:

Sleep in a Procrustes bed tonight -- you'll be a new man tomorrow!
Buy your next car from Jason's Used Car Emporium -- you won't get fleeced!
Find your next pair of spectacles at Argus Eyeglasses -- tell them Polyphemus sent you.

To close with another sort of spectacle, subscribers in the habit of marking red letter days on their calendars might wish to note thereupon that the next issue of Orphan Scrivener will flap into their in-box on l5 February 2005, which by the way marks the fifth anniversary of Orphan Scrivener's first leap out upon an unsuspecting world.

Until then, we wish you and yours all good things for the holiday season and the new year.

Best wishes
Mary R and Eric

who invite you to visit their home page, hanging out on the virtual washing line that is the aether at

http://home.epix.net/~maywrite/

Therein you'll find the usual suspects, including more personal essays and an interactive game as well as an on-line jigsaw puzzle (if you have a java-enabled browser) featuring One For Sorrow's boldly scarlet cover. For those new to the subscription list there's also the Orphan Scrivener archive, so don't say you weren't warned!


The Orphan Scrivener -- Issue # One Hundred and Fifty-Four -- 15 August 2025

As with much of the country we continue to cope as best we may with the ongoing heatwave. Fortunately we have yet to reach the type of high ...