Thursday, February 15, 2001

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER ISSUE # SEVEN -l5 FEBRUARY 200l

This issue of Orphan Scrivener reaches you a day or two into Parentalia, which the ancient Romans observed between the l3th and 2lst of February in honour of the Manes, or souls of the departed. Temples were closed during this period but families made simple offerings such as bread, wine or flowers at ancestral tombs, especially those of parents.

This quiet, reflective festival fits well into a time when the greyest month of the year is not yet over. However, fairly soon we'll be hearing the first returning geese honking as they pass overhead in those long v-shaped skeins that spearhead the changing season. And while there is no other mention of geese in this issue of Orphan Scrivener, we do refer to sheep, a whale, a lizard-like thing and a large black bird, so without further ado, we'll better get going before the menagerie gets any bigger.


MARY'S BIT or COMMODUS VON TRAPP

Remember the days when you didn't go out to the mall to see a film at a multiplex -- and hear half of what was going on in the next screening while you were at it? Those days when -- if you lived in England, at least -- you'd sit on the edge of a shabby plush (but somehow prickly) fold-up seat in the local fleapit, craning your neck this way and that to see around the heads of the people sitting in front? When the interval between Pearl & Dean's string of crackly ads for local businesses and the main feature heralded the arrival of the lady with the discreetly lit tray of ice-cream and the subsequent dash along your row, falling over patrons' feet and knocking coats off the backs of seats in a mad rush to get the last orange-flavoured ice lolly? When you kept scrapbooks made from brown paper and filled them with three-colour studio portraits of the stars, snipped from weekly film fan magazines and glued in with flour and water paste?

The recent announcement that Gladiator has been nominated for twelve Oscars reminded me of those days, or actually nights, when we went to the pictures every Friday and/or Saturday, depending on how much pocket money we had left after buying licorice whips, gobstoppers and packets of Spangles. It was at one of those local cinemas, small but with suitably baroque architecture, that I first saw the retelling of The Fall of the Roman Empire. Alec Guinness played a grave Marcus Aurelius and Christopher Plummer a rather sinister but well-spoken Commodus and whereas Rome was proverbially not built in a day, the Empire managed to crumble around statuesque Sophia Loren in the space of a mere three hours. Not that we noticed its extraordinary length, for we sat enthralled, overlooking even the usual jumps and changes in depth of colour as the reels changed, not to mention that irritating occasional patch of light that spilled over the screen as patrons entered or exited through the main doors at the rear, behind the not-quite-tall-enough curtain hanging on a brass rail running along behind the back row of seating.

Every evening's presentation ended with the playing of the national anthem, during which the audience stood -- or at least those who had not rushed out as the credits began to roll so they could catch their last bus home or start the brisk walk back through cold, smoky night air or perhaps just to avoid having to stand there feeling like a lemon as most of the audience slunk off through the exit before the anthem was even half done.

We all went to the pictures at least once a week, no matter what the film happened to be. The fact that they arrived locally years after they premiered was neither here nor there. If they showed it, we would come. At least, if we could get in. Occasionally there was a problem when the film had been rated A by the Board of Censors, whose certificate prefaced all films. The sight of a hand-written title set within their florid printed declaration that the film in question had been judged suitable for a particular audience, as sometimes shows up when old films are presented on late night TV, must bring nostalgic tears to eyes that originally saw the same certificate in a cinematic setting.

There were three rating categories: U (Universal, considered suitable for all audiences), A (Adult, judged too mature for children) and X (reserved for horror films). However, younger persons were admitted to view an A film if they were accompanied by an adult and so we guttersnipes would hang about in the foyer asking "Will you take us in, missus?" should we arrive to find that the poster for the feature of the week displayed the dreaded, if not scarlet, A. Thus many a courting couple began a romantic evening by agreeing to escort three or four children -- unknown to them or for that matter to each other -- into the cinema. Needless to say, the ticket-seller in her glass-fronted mini-fortress turned the proverbial blind eye when the "offspring" peeled off into the lower floor and their temporary parents went upstairs to the balcony, a favourite haunt of amorous duos. Well, after all, it was a bit more private and certainly less expensive than that other popular destination for the working class weekend date, the Palais de Dance, recalled so nostalgically in the Kinks' Come Dancing.

However, the Saturday morning matinees for children were a different business entirely. With most of the audience stamping their feet, whistling, cheering and booing and (I regret to say) occasionally running up and down the aisles, these screenings were much more raucous and lively affairs. They were attended by very few adults -- and that was just as well considering that most of the boys perched in the balcony so they could lob small missiles of various sorts over its edge (scrunched up bits of paper were particularly popular) in the hopes of hitting one of the girls sitting far below. Not that they entirely got away with it, as there was a fair amount of hair-pulling when the matinee was over and it was a wise boy who got away quickly as soon as the house lights came up after our weekly ration of a newsreel, a cartoon or two and the next episode in the serial. It was fortunate indeed that a snack I hear was on sale in later years at the Bensham, another cinema we patronised, was not available in those days. One shudders to think what those wretched lads would have got up to with helpings of soup.

Our much-loved picture houses were not exactly from the Grand Electric Kinematic Palace mould. If you've seen The Smallest Show On Earth, you'll have a good idea of the sort of cinema we went to, although I will admit that I never encountered a ticket-seller quite as eccentric as Margaret Rutherford's character. Even so, imagine my surprised delight when I recently stumbled over a photograph of the Coatsworth, a particular favourite when we lived in Gateshead, displayed in the council's local history page.

Looking at that familiar soot-stained facade again after so long, I could almost hear the shouts of "See you at the flicks!" as we rushed down the back lane after school, anxious to gulp down our tea and get going. We could hardly wait. It was Friday and that meant a new film was showing! Even the Academy Awards just don't seem to generate the same sort of excitement and perhaps we're all the poorer for it.


NECESSARY EVIL or THE BSP TICKER

We don't have much news to impart this time around, so we'll leap straight into it.

ONE FOR JOY or THE RAVEN HAS (ALMOST) LANDED

Speaking of awards, as Kaspar Gutman possibly remarked of the Maltese Falcon, "It would be an honor, sir, a fine honor indeed, to own a large black bird such as that." And so it would be, if he happened to be talking about the Raven Award. Thus it is with great delight that, just in case you missed it, we mention here that the Mystery Writers of America recently announced that it will be presenting a Raven Award to our editor Barbara Peters. The Raven is described on the MWA website as recognising "outstanding achievement in the mystery field outside the realm of creative writing". So congratulations to Barbara and all at Poisoned Pen Press!

RETURN OF THE SCRIVENERS or A TALK, NOT A TABBY

And speaking of matters mysterious, how about a chat? No, not a cat but rather a chin-wag. Poe's Raven may have croaked "Nevermore", but Talk City is not so fortunate since we are returning to darken its virtual doorstep on March 7th when Stephanie Shea hosts a chat for, and with, us and whoever else decides to drop in.

If you'd like to visit, you'll get there by going to http://home.talkcity.com/LibraryDr/mysteryplace and then clicking on "author chatroom", which will take you to the EZtalk page. Type in your name and password and hit "go chat". (If you haven't registered, just click on the registration link and follow the onscreen instructions. When that's done, click "continue" and that'll take you to the chat room. It sounds more complicated than it actually is in practice, honestly!

Authors appearing on the Talk City for the rest of February are Bev Connors ("Airtight Case") on the 2lst and Karen Irving ("Jupiter's Daughter") on the 28th. After our chat on March 7th, S. J. Rozan ("Reflecting the Sky") is the guest on March l4th, so tune up your clickers and grab your chance to mercilessly grill a few authors -- hope we'll see you there!

JUST WHILE YOU'RE HERE or A SMALL COMMERCIAL BREAK

We'd like to mention that, after a slight delay, the hardcover of Two For Joy is now on sale, decked out in a beautifully lush green and gold cover. Twofer received a rave review in Booklist whose ratings, we understand, are much relied upon by libraries, so perhaps you could ask your local librarian to look us up some time. Meantime, to catch up on John's earlier adventures, there's also One For Sorrow in hardcover or trade paperback edition. Three For A Letter Is Proceeding Along. More on that in due course.


ERIC'S BIT or THOUGHTS ON A SHOCKING MOVIE

Growing up in the United States when neighborhood theaters were already being squeezed out of existence by television, I wasn't the movie-goer Mary was. My friends and I spent hours watching old Tarzan and Three Stooges movies on TV while debating who were the "real" Tarzans and Curly's and who the fakes.

My earliest celluloid recollection is of the drive-in next door to the house where we spent the summer. Just before bed time I'd be allowed to walk to the wire mesh fence at the end of our big lawn to see the cartoon shown before the movie. There was something startling about watching gigantic, garishly colored shapes flashing around the enormous screen in the soft summer twilight. From where I stood no dialog could be heard except, if the breeze was right, an occasional tinny murmur from a car speaker set up high. Aside from that, the cinematic action was accompanied only by the usual summer noises of insects and frogs.

In fact, although local movie theatres were by then dying out around the country, one still remained open a couple of minutes' walk from my house. It was owned by, and named for, my best friend's grandfather. I don't remember much except admission was l4 cents so I'd still have allowance money left for penny candy. My friends and I went to see westerns and our favorite was Gunfight at the O.K. Corral, which we re-fought hundreds of times in our back yards.

But there were some disappointments. The eagerly awaited Three Stooges In Orbit starred what appeared to us to be suddenly elderly geezers, not to mention an obviously fake Curly. Moby Dick was even more disappointing. To be blunt, the whale wasn't scary. What is a monster movie without a decent monster? The makers of Reptilicus must have learned something from it, though, because their production featured a reasonably destructive giant lizard and that severed foot floating to the bottom of the sea at the conclusion, at which point you immediately knew that...whoa...he's gonna regenerate! Now that's a really dramatic ending, compared to some silly looking peg-legged puppet flapping its arm about as it vanishes underwater on the back of a artificial whale.

We lived in constant hope that one day a movie would scare us to death but (as you see) it never happened. The special effects just weren't up to it. We'd start talking about this or that science fiction feature days in advance, conjuring up the most delicious terrors imaginable. By the time we went to the theater we'd worked ourselves into a fever pitch but the monster always, finally -- and usually after the film makers had titillated us for 80 minutes -- turned out to be manufactured from painted cardboard or a tarted up bag of jello, a bigger swiz than the snake woman at the County Fair.

We were particularly gung-ho to see William Castle's The Tingler, where your seat was supposed to administer the occasional shock and scary stuff came flying out on wires, or maybe they used 3-D projections or something like that or so we figured, and people actually had died of fright, but that never came to our little local cinema. I guess my friend didn't have that much pull with his grandfather.

But I'll bet The Tingler would've been really shocking.


AND FINALLY

Alas, the dark clouds of April l5th are already lurking stormily on the horizon and for US residents at least this annual day of fiscal reckoning looms ever closer. However, some light relief for those being fleeced by the tax man may be obtained by contemplating Parilia. Held on April 2lst, it was a bucolic festival for which sheep folds were decorated and their occupants purified. Offerings were made and prayers said for the health and safety of shepherds and their ovine charges. It seems that part of the Parilian jamboree involved the shepherds leaping through small fires and apparently their flocks were also herded between two bonfires as a further rite of protection.

Fortunately our subscribers don't have to go through fire in order to receive their next issue of Orphan Scrivener, since it'll automatically arrive on April l5th. If nothing else, we can guarantee that reading it will be less taxing than ploughing through the instruction booklet for IRS Form l040.

Best wishes

Mary and Eric

whose home page lurks about at:
http://home.epix.net/~maywrite/

Therein you'll find the usual suspects plus more personal essays, an interactive game and an on-line jigsaw puzzle (at least for those who have java-enabled browsers) featuring One For Sorrow's boldly scarlet cover. For those new to the subscription list there's also the Orphan Scrivener archive, so don't say you weren't warned!

Friday, December 15, 2000

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER -- ISSUE # SIX -- l5 DECEMBER 2000

December's cold, grey, early-sunset days are cheered by more than one festival and of the ancient Roman jamborees, Saturnalia (whose revels begin on December l7th) is probably one of the best known -- as well as the jolliest. Commemorating mankind's long gone Golden Age, when peace and harmony prevailed under the rule of the agricultural god Saturn, Saturnalia was a time when social order was turned topsy turvy. Celebrations included gift-giving, feasting, gambling, singing and general carryings-on (sometimes of a most licentious nature). As part of the traditional reversal of roles during the week-long festival, masters waited on household slaves during meals and there's an echo of this custom even today in the British tradition whereby senior officers in the armed forces serve Christmas dinner to the ranks. Similarly, surgeons and consultants appear on the wards on Christmas Day to ceremonially carve festive turkeys (with much humorous patter about blunt scalpels and bird innards) for those patients unfortunate enough to be spending the holiday in hospital.

Although "Golden Age" means something very different to mystery fans, we believe there can never be too many festivals and since this Orphan Scrivener is bigger than usual, we'll delay you no longer -- so with the traditional shout of Io Saturnalia, let the fun begin!


ERIC'S BIT or SOME SEASONAL MUSINGS

Did you believe in Santa Claus?

I did. I can't remember exactly what it felt like to live in a world where a bearded guy in a red suit delivered presents with the help of flying reindeer. I do know that it was a very different world than the one I'm living in now.

It's hard to understand how I could have believed such nonsense, but then I believed in the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy too, and they're even more incredible than Santa.After all, how could the Tooth Fairy get those quarters under my pillow without waking me up? That had to be magic!

Kids aren't out of touch with reality, they just take a more flexible approach to it. Robert Kavanaugh, a professor at Williams College in Massachusetts, explored "magical thinking" in a test involving an assistant, children aged 4 to 6 and an empty box. The assistant showed the children the box, then talked about a fox who lived in the box. When the assistant left the room some of the children, even though they knew the box was empty, began to hear the fox inside it and expected the imaginary creature to pop out momentarily.

My friends and I sometimes made up our own reality, in similar fashion. I remember particularly the Indian who was buried in the mossy mound at the base of the birch tree we could just make out, glimmering in the twilight, at the edge of the small patch of woods behind our homes. It was safe to poke at the grave during daylight but if anyone dared approach at night the Indian's outraged ghost would come flying out, all misty and amorphous and horrible, intent on doing whatever unnamable things ghosts do to the poor, foolish kids they catch.

Or so Johnny and I told Tommy one evening. Unfortunately, by the time the three of us had crept to within a few yards of the tree which glowed spookily in the gathering dark, Johnny and I were more convinced in the reality of our made-up phantom than Tommy was. The phosphorescent fox fire from some rotted limbs near the mound brought our invention to full, horrifying reality and sent us running for our lives.

Adults shape their own realities too but usually more subtly. However, writers and readers still experience some of childhood's outright reality molding. I'm not talking just about creating a bit of fiction or simply reading the words. When I'm contributing my part of the Byzantine mystery novels Mary and I have been writing, I find, to be successful, I have to work with a divided mind. A part of me has to remain outside the story, monitoring the words critically. Will they make sense to the reader, do they actually convey what I want them to? But another part has to be immersed in the tale, has to believe that John and his friends are real, that the ancient streets they walk and the dangers they face exist. If some corner of my brain doesn't believe in the story I'm making up, in the same way as most of my brain believed in Santa Claus when I was a kid, I can't make the writing come to life. Of course, readers also have to be willing to suspend their disbelief, to act as accomplices in the game for a few hours. I guess that's part of the deal writers and readers strike with each other.

Now, if I could only believe in Santa Claus again.


NECESSARY EVIL or THE BSP TICKER

The old year departs bowed down with the longest Necessary Evil thus far. Much Has Happened since the last Orphan Scrivener was issued, so, trying to keep things to manageable length, we'll leap right into it.

JOHN SPEAKS

And now for an announcement! On December l7th the first interview given by John the Eunuch will be published online in the Charlotte Austin Review Ltd John was recently grilled by the Review's Susan McBride, whom you'll know as author of the award-nominated mystery And Then She Was Gone; Overkill (second in her Maggie Ryan series) will appear in autumn 200l, by the way. Now, if you haven't seen the Review you're in for a treat -- under the guiding hand of its eponymous Editor-in-Chief, it's gained an international audience with visitors from more than 40 countries, but that's not really surprising given it already offers over 550 book reviews and more than 80 feature interviews as well as 22 columns. So do drop by to read John's thoughts on topics ranging from the life he would have led had he not been appointed Justinian's Lord Chamberlain to speculation on what society will be like in 2000.

TWO DEGREES FROM ELLIS PETERS

Never mind about six, at the end of December we'll be a mere two degrees away from Ellis Peters and it's all Sue Feder's fault! You'll know her award-winning Magical Mystery Tour website, which at last count featured over 900 mystery reviews. Having founded the Ellis Peters Appreciation Society, Sue says she then cast her eyes around for another writer to torment but they all hid. So (as she puts it) to get even with a bunch of them all at once, she organised the Historical Mystery Appreciation Society, whose website is incorporated in the Magical Mystery Tour -- you'll find a link to it from the Tour's home page at: http://members.home.net/monkshould/ The December issue of Murder Past Tense, the quarterly journal of the HMAS, brings with it an interview we did with Ellen Healey, and thus we don with pride our Two Degrees From Ellis hats. Thanks, guys!

JOHN'S BIOGRAPHERS GET ANOTHER WORD IN

Recognised by Family PC Magazine as one of its Top l00 family sites, it's only been about four years since BookBrowser, The Guide for Avid Readers, was launched but already it's reached over 5,500 "pages" with (at last count) almost 5000 reviews from 25 reviewers -- not to mention reading lists and info on series and forthcoming titles. So we were honoured to be grilled recently by well-known mystery fan and reviewer Doris Ann Norris for BookBrowser (see: http://www.bookbrowser.com/authors/interviews/ReedandMayer.html ) Appreciative thanks to BookBrowser owners Janet Lawson and Cindy Orr, as well as to Doris Ann, our interrogator.

HANGING OUT WITH MR ROGERS

And speaking of Doris Ann, her other hat is as Director of the Kaubisch Memorial Public Library in Fostoria, OH. This November the library's Youth Services Department held its annual Children's Book Week (celebrated from the l2th through the l8th). As part of the event, various officials, celebrities and authors were asked to contribute a few thoughts on a favourite book from childhood, why it was their favourite and what reading has meant in their lives and careers. Mr Rogers and a number of authors of both children's and adult books were among those who responded. We were lurking among them and our essays boldly revealed that our favourite childhood books were Little Women and The Wind In The Willows -- ah, but who chose which title? You'll have to check: http://home.epix.net/maywrite/favorite.htm to solve that particular mystery!

READERS OF THE LOST ARK

We've certainly been haunting libraries this past month or so, as One for Sorrow was discussed in December by a Philadelphia reading group, to whom thanks are also due. "Readers of the Lost Ark" has been in existence for five years now. Their particular interest is anthropological, archaeological or early historical mysteries. Meetings are the third Monday of the month, September to June, in the library of the University of Pennsylvania's Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology at 3260 South Street, Philadelphia, PA l9l04- 6324. Members include librarians, chemists, art historians, and teachers and cyber-members are welcome, although they'll miss out on lively discussions and the guilty pleasure of refreshments (usually candy and cookies) that are normally a forbidden activity in the library! The next meeting is on December 18. If you'd like to attend, contact Anita Fahringer at afahr@pobox.upenn.edu or (2l5) 898 l024 for details.

WINDING UP NECESSARY EVIL (AND ABOUT TIME TOO)

In closing, we'll mention that Twofer has received some really great reviews, (collected for perusal at: http://home.epix.net/~maywrite/tworev.htm

Having already been asked once or twice, yes, we've begun writing the third novel, which will rejoice in the title of Three For A Letter (from the variant counting rhyme with which Mary grew up).It will be set partly on the country estate of Anatolius' Uncle Zeno. Zeno is an elderly scholar but also (as John has observed) a man of eclectic credulity. Alas, he has the misfortune to be involved in a celebration attended by the empress, during which things go very badly wrong -- and so John must undertake another investigation.


MARY'S MISCELLANY or BYZANTINE BITS AND BOBS

Speaking of eclectic credulity, this section is devoted to what interior decorating mavens always term an eclectic mix, or as others might say, it's a cornucopia of creative conceptions.

Ladies first, then. Since Lady Jennie Churchill costumed as Theodora was mentioned last time, it's only fair this time around to see that Justinian gets his due. Tayfun Oner has created a computer-generated portrait of the emperor, based upon the Ravenna mosaics. This is the younger Justinian, looking enigmatic but there's a harder edge to his gaze as well. See if you agree -- it's at: http://www.byzantium1200.org/justinian.html Justinian's portrait is part of the Byzantium l200 website, which is devoted to reconstructions of the architectural bare bones of Byzantine buildings in Istanbul in l200. While this was several centuries after John's time, there are a number of places and edifices he knew, including the Chalke, the Milion and various forums. There are also several photos of a very impressive scale model of the Great Palace at: http://www.byzantium1200.org/greatpalace.html which gives an idea of the crowded landscape through which John, Anatolius, Felix and the others moved.

Constantinople's ever present stylites (some of whom play unfortunate although important parts in Two For Joy) were not of course able to move very far, reminding me that I was recently pointed towards Tennyson's poem about St Simeon Stylites http://home.att.net/~TennysonPoetry/stsa.htm

More than somewhat gritty, it describes Simeon's doubts as to his worthiness and along the way mentions the mortifications of the flesh he practiced before ascending his pillar. It would be interesting to discover why Tennyson wrote a poem about this saintly stylite, so if anyone has a clue, do let us know..


AND FINALLY

200l is not far away now, with the turn of the year hoving ever more rapidly into view. As it happens, we keep up the New Year's Eve custom of first- footing, and so it has been years since my brother has actually seen the new year in indoors, for being a dark-haired man his is the mandatory foot which must be first over the threshold after the new year has been rung in. So he's always thrust outside a minute or so before midnight tolls out the old year, and then (carrying a lump of coal, a coin, and a piece of cake to represent good fortune for the coming twelve months) he's let back inside as soon as January lst has safely arrived.

But it's a good job the First Footer doesn't have to hang about outside until the first Orphan Scrivener of 200l shows up, since it will trundle into your email in-box on February l5th, somewhat late for New Year celebrations. However, February l5th was the date upon which another festival, Lupercalia, was anciently observed by the Romans. The Luperci (male youths dressed only in the skins of recently sacrificed goats) raced through the streets as part of ceremonial purifications carried out during February (februare, to purify or expiate). As they went about, they struck female passersby with strips of goat-skin in a traditional fertility ritual, apparently in connection with, or inspired by, the goat's lecherous reputation.

While this issue of Orphan Scrivener will mercifully arrive sans goats, unfortunately it cannot cross your cyber thresholds clutching coal, coin or cake. Nonetheless, it does carry with it our hopes for a good new year for you all. May it be healthy and happy -- and we'll see you again in February.

Best wishes
Mary and Eric
whose home page lurks about at: http://home.epix.net/~maywrite/

Therein you'll find the usual suspects plus personal essays, an interactive game and an on-line jigsaw puzzle (at least for those who have java-enabled browsers) featuring One For Sorrow's boldly scarlet cover. For those who are new to the subscription list there's also the Orphan Scrivener archive, so don't say you weren't warned!


Sunday, October 15, 2000

THE ORPHAN SCRIVENER -- ISSUE # FIVE l5 OCTOBER 2000

We're writing this as autumn colours leaves deep gold, rich ruby or lemon yellow and maples flare like scarlet beacons on the hills. But the sunshine is watery and the shadows lie long and blue, not only reminding us that winter will soon be here but also that the last Orphan Scrivener was issued in the brazen days of high summer. How quickly the past two months have galloped past.

Speaking of galloping, on October l5th the ancient Romans honoured Mars with the Equus October festival, during which a two-horse chariot race was held. The right-hand equine of the winning team was sacrificed to the god, a left-handed compliment to be sure, but it's been suggested that as the horse was noble, strong and newly victorious it was considered a fitting offering for Mars. In a curious postscript, teams then contested for the sacrificial horse's head, which the winners publicly displayed in their part of town. And now, changing horses in mid-stream, we'll race ahead with this newsletter.


MARY'S BIT or BEWARE OF THEODORA'S HAIR-PIN

What a wonderful sight it must have been when Zenobia,Queen of Palmyra, made her grand entrance. Resplendent in embroidered gold tissue garments sewn with emeralds, diamonds, rubies, and other jewels, set off by a lavishly embroidered green velvet trailing train decorated with more gems in a lotus flower motif -- not to mention a golden crown encrusted with diamonds, festooned with pearls and accented with ostrich plumes -- in a word, or actually three, Zenobia eclipsed Theodora.

A daring move indeed, you may be saying, especially considering new arrivals at Justinian's court were doubtless discreetly advised that it would be unwise for them to (reversing metaphors) outshine the imperial couple -- and especially Theodora, a woman of peppery temperament to say the least. Indeed, Zenobia might have lived long enough to regret her display of expensive finery, but fortunately the outfit just described was in fact donned by the Duchess of Devonshire to merely play the part of Zenobia, and that only for one night.

For the duchess was hostess of a costumed ball held at Devonshire House in London on 2nd July l897. It's fair to say that her gathering of the creme de la creme of society was one that would have competed on an equal footing with any jamboree organised at the Constantinople court -- while being much less nerve-racking for its gilded guests.

One of several hundred blue-blooded attendees at the ball was Winston's mother, Lady Randolph Churchill, née Jennie Jerome (born in Amity Street, New York, next down from Congress Street where Eric lived while attending college). Lady Jennie decided to go as Theodora and her costume was accordingly based upon the Ravenna mosaic portrait of the empress. Thus her beautifully sewn garments were just as heavily embroidered and lavishly ornamented, and look equally uncomfortable to wear, as may be seen by pointing your clicker HERE . These photos of Lady Jennie as Theodora are among images of numerous of the costumed guests, including the redoubtable Duchess of Devonshire herself, forming part of the Lafayette Negative Collection in London's Victoria and Albert Museum.

In an aside, the website mentioned also provides a detailed description of the plot of Victorien Sardou's elaborate play THEODORA, which debuted in Paris in l884 with Sarah Bernhardt in the title role. Scenes are set in and under the Hippodrome as well as at Justinian's court and mystery aficionados will be interested to hear that the play features a novel murder weapon, Theodora's golden hair-pin. Having used the hair-pin to stab a man to death, she tells Justinian she did it because the man had insulted her -- not the real reason at all, needless to say.

Returning to our muttons (as Sardou's fellow countrymen so colourfully say) I must confess that upon reading The Times' detailed description of some of the costumes I found myself wondering why the Duchess of Sutherland attended the event as Charlotte Corday, assassin of Jean-Paul Marat. Hers was a modest get-up indeed, consisting of a plain red gown and a muslin cap adorned with a tricolour rosette.

On a woo woo note, The Times reported that supper for the glittering throng was served in a huge garden tent hung with Louis XIV tapestries depicting Roman scenes. While particulars of these scenes are unfortunately not given, doubtless they were easy to see by the newfangled electric lights attached to garlands of flowers festooned around the tent walls. The gardens, through which guests strolled until the early hours of the following morning, were also illuminated, ensuring none of the distinguished revellers ran the risk of falling into a decorative garden pond -- unlike the barbaric Sir Thomas in ONE FOR SORROW.


NECESSARY EVIL or THE BSP TICKER

We were recently honoured to be listed in Willetta Heising's Mystery Series Week 2000 pocket calendar -- we're lurking about in the entry for October 5. Over three hundred mystery series linked to more than a hundred historical events are mentioned in its eighty pages, and it's stuffed with interesting facts and trivia. And there's more! Title lists are given for every author appearing therein. You'll find the calendar in libraries and bookstores and you can also download it HERE

Willetta tells us that authors, publishers and readers are welcome to suggest a historical event with a mystery series tie-in for the 200l calendar by sending an e-mail to purplemoon@prodigy.net. Next year's Mystery Series Week dates are October 7th to l3th.

The paperback edition of ONE FOR SORROW is available now from Poisoned Pen Press or your favorite bookstore. Its striking scarlet jacket provides a nice contrast to the lush green and gold cover of TWO FOR JOY, which will be out in a week or three.

In Twofer, John and his friends find themselves embroiled in a strange web of events that begin when a stylite spontaneously combusts atop his pillar. John's investigations into the matter are hampered by his old philosophy tutor and a heretical Christian holy man whose ultimatums threaten to topple Justinian and destroy the empire. The cast includes a runaway wife, not to mention servants, soldiers, and mendicants as well as the venomous court page Hektor and a wealthy landowner or two -- plus John's bete noire, Empress Theodora. Old favourites Isis, Felix, Peter, and that headstrong young man Anatolius also play important roles. You can read an excerpt on Amazon.com .


ERIC'S BIT or FLYING UNDER THE RADAR

Most readers and writers would probably agree that the history in a historical mystery should be accurate. If your mystery plot depends, say, upon Oliver Cromwell, Jack the Ripper and Gertrude Stein being contemporaries (heaven forbid!) then you're writing alternative history. Unfortunately the question of accuracy is rarely so simple. The historical record, not to mention common sense, would indicate that Queen Victoria didn't hunt Jack down in her spare time, let alone by posing as a member of a traveling circus, but then again maybe the historians missed that. The trick to writing imaginative historical mysteries is keeping just under the radar of the historians.

There is definitely some flying room there. A little research, especially reading the footnotes, quickly reveals that historians sometimes don't know quite as much as it appears. What looks like a detailed drawing often turns out, on examination, to be a few scattered dots of facts connected into a coherent pattern by the historian based on his general expertise and personal theories. Another historian might connect those same dots into an altogether different picture. In TWO FOR JOY we mention the pagan philosophers who fled to foreign shores when Justinian shut down Plato's Academy. The story is often alluded to, but is actually mentioned only briefly in a handful of sources.

But sources also can be untrustworthy. Consider Procopius who, while in Justinian's service, wrote panegyrics to the emperor but in his posthumously discovered SECRET HISTORY excoriated him as a rapacious demon without a face. As a writer, when faced with such inconsistency, I prefer to choose whatever suits my purpose! That might sound like cheating but, I suspect, historians do much the same thing in a somewhat more sophisticated way.

It must also be remembered that surviving records can be spotty. (Not surprising after l500 years -- I have a hard enough time keeping track of the mailing list for this newsletter for two months). Much of what we know well, we know by chance and what survives is not always what we would expect. During the life of Justinian, Cassiodorus wrote a massive GOTHIC HISTORY. Strangely, those twelve volumes have vanished but a short abridgment, THE GETICA, by Jordanes, probably made during Cassiodorus' lifetime, survives.

I'm not arguing that historical mystery writers have a license to be inaccurate but rather that they should take advantage of the many available opportunities to be creative. To put the matter into legal terms, the fiction writer's burden of proof is the opposite of the historian's. Historians must prove what they say is true while historical writers are allowed to say just about anything that can't be proved false.


AND FINALLY

We'll now run amuck and mix civilizations and eras to close by paraphrasing James V of Scotland's gloomy prophecy concerning the future of the Scottish crown -- we arrived wi' horses and we'll depart wi' horses. That's because the next Orphan Scrivener will trot in on December l5th, the later of two Consualia festivals (the other was observed on August 2lst). Honouring Consus, Roman god of underground grain bins and later of secret counsel, it featured mule races -- although working horses got the day off. So enjoy your days off and we'll thunder into your email box in eight weeks.

Best wishes,
Mary and Eric

The Orphan Scrivener -- Issue # One Hundred and Sixty -- 15 August 2026

While in north Africa years ago, a member of the family demonstrated it is indeed possible to fry an egg on a vehicle bonnet although wheth...